| If h-bar is h/2pi then it is approx .16 h. And if h is a fundamental
| minimum unit of action, what the hell is h-bar?
>Why do you think h is the minimun unit of action instead of hbar?
Because from Planck on down everyone says so.
As to h/2pi, is that 2pi --- or 2pi radians?
If it is 2pi, I stand on my original qestion. If it is 2pi radians,
then I observe the following:
2pi radians is 360 degrees, one revolution. How kosher is it to divide
action by degrees? What do you get?
Golden Boar - 19 May 2006 19:08 GMT
> >Why do you think h is the minimun unit of action instead of hbar?
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> 2pi radians is 360 degrees, one revolution. How kosher is it to divide
> action by degrees? What do you get?
The radian a dimensionless unit.
If you want to think of these constants in terms or a circle, then
think on this.
h is equivalent to a circle with a circumference of 1.
hbar is equivalent to a circle with a radius of 1.
A circle with a radius of 1, is known as the unit circle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_circle
FrediFizzx - 19 May 2006 19:45 GMT
| >Why do you think h is the minimun unit of action instead of hbar?
|
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
| 2pi radians is 360 degrees, one revolution. How kosher is it to divide
| action by degrees? What do you get?
Think of angular momentum. My work here is done.
FrediFizzx
http://www.vacuum-physics.com