Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / June 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Do Do - 04 Jun 2006 14:10 GMT
                   PARTICLE PHYSICS

If you take two pieces of china and smash them together violently, what

do you get?
Small shards of pottery flying in all directions.

If you take two protons and smash them together violently, what do you
get? Small shards
flying in all directions.

The difference is that in the case of the protons the shards are
standing waves with charge, etc., - but shards
nevertheless. However, as standing waves, they are not in resonance and

so are unstable. Thus they immediately reduce to resonant frequencies
and become other stable particles. This is known as "decay".

Classifying the plethora of shards became a project - a not too
successful project. Gell-Mann attempted
to find common denominators to the "atomic zoo". Thus was born
Quarks - which was extended to ridiculous heights and declared super
particles that were the composition of protons and neutrons, etc.
Folly at its best.

In order to keep their jobs, the accelerator operators laid on the
biggest con job in the world. After all they had to keep the money
rolling in or they were out of a job. Besides, they had an unearned
prestige to keep up.

Below is a sample of their technique.

"The machine could cost more than $6 billion, would measure roughly
20 miles from one side to the other and would require so many advanced
technologies that no single country could supply them all. Its goal
would be to mine the areas opened up by evidence indicating that
ultra-powerful new accelerators may be crucial in explaining not just
the nature of matter and energy but also the birth of the universe and
the structure of space and time themselves.

According to some theories, the machine could see evidence for
previously unknown dimensions, beyond the usual four, lurking right
under humanity's noses. Elusive particles that account for most of the
mass of the entire universe - the so-called dark matter - could
also turn up.

Scientists also hope to test theories that describe how the universe
may have behaved in its first explosive instants and to work out the
detailed properties of a particle called the Higgs boson. Believed to
be the key to why other particles have mass, the Higgs, if it exists,
may be discovered by accelerators now operating or being built."

Can you believe that? A house of cards.

I wonder if the "machine" could pull rabits out of a hat -- or maybe
reveal a cure for cancer.
PD - 06 Jun 2006 19:00 GMT
> PARTICLE PHYSICS
>
> In order to keep their jobs, the accelerator operators laid on the
> biggest con job in the world. After all they had to keep the money
> rolling in or they were out of a job. Besides, they had an unearned
> prestige to keep up.

There are plenty of things to do in physics.
Tell me: If you were told that you had the opportunity to go to school
and work 90 hour weeks for substitence pay for 5 to 10 years, just so
that you could be trained in a LIE that you would have to maintain for
the rest of your life, carefully protecting the secret from all who
might have the least amount of brains -- would you do it?

PD
Phineas T Puddleduck - 06 Jun 2006 23:13 GMT
> > PARTICLE PHYSICS
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> PD

The thing I love most about physics is that to every question you
answer, you unveil four more. Its about the thrill of the chase. But
I'm quite sad, as I find certain differential equations such as the
Laplacian inherently beautiful.

Signature

The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.

"Time is pseudo-directional because randomness is always pseudo-random..."
Jeff revolutionises physics in sci.physics.

"Now there's two stuck naysay lose cannons and a third sick puppy on the way."
Brad tries to reason with the voices in his head...

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.