 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / July 2006Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas, how are they able to retain so much of their energy? And if they lose energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they originally possessed. > I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge > hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this > is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas, > how are they able to retain so much of their energy? And if they lose > energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they > originally possessed. Why would they lose charge?  SignatureRelf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ "Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches the odour of roses." -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology. -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE". Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding. -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006 "I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006 "I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006 PWNED -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ "Puddlefuck tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006 PWNED -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge 50 eV is an energy, not a charge, and not much energy to boot. Might be good to recheck the reading to find out what it really said. > hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this > is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas, > how are they able to retain so much of their energy? Why would they lose energy? Things generally don't lose energy unless something else acts to take it away -- e.g. friction. > And if they lose > energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they > originally possessed. > > I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they > > originally possessed. I gave an arbitrary figure for the eV. 1TeV would have been excessive. These particles must come into contact with other celestial bodies\particles where there will be loses in energy. Google searches have prove fruitless on this topic. > > > I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge > > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > bodies\particles where there will be loses in energy. Google searches > have prove fruitless on this topic. OK, let me see if I have this right. You don't remember what you read, so you made up a number rather than looking it up. You don't know whether eV measures charge or energy. You assume that everything MUST encounter celestial particles and lose energy in that process. Have you considered reading something other than the internet? PD > > > > I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge > > > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > encounter celestial particles and lose energy in that process. Have you > considered reading something other than the internet? If you can't answer the question why not ignore my post, simple! > PD > > > > I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge > > > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > encounter celestial particles and lose energy in that process. Have you > considered reading something other than the internet? If you can't answer the question why not ignore my post, simple! > PD On 8/7/06 09:54, in article 1152348856.458582.11070@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "muser" <charlie12345@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge >>>> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] >> >> PD You DON'T have a question SignatureRelf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ "Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches the odour of roses." -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson Why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology. -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE". Pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding. -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ TomGee proves his physics education is beyond measure... "I don't know that much math." - 2 April 2006 "I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - 10 May 2006 "There is no such thing as relativistic momentum" - July 2006 -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ "Puddlefuck tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006 PWNED -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge > > > > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > If you can't answer the question why not ignore my post, simple! That's why I responded to your post, to clarify your question. When I found out that you had no idea what you were asking, I pointed that out. > > PD > > > > > > I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge > > > > > [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > > > PD This is actually what I was looking for. There is even a principle backing what I wrote in my original post. Link http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlkop/cosray.html > > > > > > > I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge > > > > > > [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > backing what I wrote in my original post. Link > http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlkop/cosray.html OK, so what's your question? PD > > > > > > > > I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge > > > > > > > [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > PD It has been answered. I shouldn't have confused charge with energy, replace charge with energy in my original post and there is the question. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.