Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / September 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Quark Charge

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Quantum Ranger - 05 Sep 2006 20:32 GMT
Is there any reliable source (Historical Definition), of how Quarks
came to be assigned their specific quantity?

How the fractions came to be chosen and for what mathematical reason?

Any source links would be gratefully appreciated.
FrediFizzx - 05 Sep 2006 20:49 GMT
> Is there any reliable source (Historical Definition), of how Quarks
> came to be assigned their specific quantity?
>
> How the fractions came to be chosen and for what mathematical reason?
>
> Any source links would be gratefully appreciated.

I think originally the quarks were assigned +,- 1 values of charge but
that violated the Pauli exclusion principle.  So a trialility scheme was
devised.  Which also ended up matching experimental evidence in DIS at
SLAC.

Griffiths' "Introduction to Elementary Particles".

FrediFizzx

Quantum Vacuum Charge papers;
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0601110
http://www.vacuum-physics.com
Hawkwind - 08 Sep 2006 20:14 GMT
Quantum Ranger schrieb:

> Is there any reliable source (Historical Definition), of how Quarks
> came to be assigned their specific quantity?
>
> How the fractions came to be chosen and for what mathematical reason?
>
> Any source links would be gratefully appreciated.

At the beginning of the 60ers, Gell-Mann had detected the eightfold way
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eightfold_way_%28physics%29

He had represented the observed hadrons - classified into groups
according to their spin - as points in a coordinate system where some
quantum numbers were used as axes. Doing this, Gell-Mann had observed
that these particles arrange as patterns which were already known in
mathematics as representations of the group SU(3). This way, Gell-Mann
noticed that one of the patterns had been incomplete. In fact, he could
predict the existence of an additional particle (the missing one( which
could be found later.
However, the most peculiar thing was that the most fundamental
presentation of that group SU(3) was missing in nature. So he
postulated its existence. It consists of 3 particles called quarks
which combine to build the observed hadrons.
SInce the charges of 3 of them (as dictated by SU(3)) have to add up to
result in the charges of the baryons (proton, neutron etc.), the
charges
up : +2/3
down: -1/3
strange:-1/3
are a most natural choice.
This way you can build the neutral neutron as (up, down, down) and the
positive proton as (up, up, down) and the charges of all other hadrons
consistently.
A bit of the history is given in the link above.
Quantum Ranger - 17 Sep 2006 11:02 GMT
Many thanks both, this is exactly what I need!
> Quantum Ranger schrieb:
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> consistently.
> A bit of the history is given in the link above.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.