If acceleration and gravity are equivilent for "some" descriptive
equations of GR, then is it correct to state that, a highly accelerated
particle, is really a gravited particle? Particles accelerated to close
to light speed gain Mass, thus gain Gravity.
Or is it taht Mass and Gravity are equivilent at light velocities?
PD - 19 Sep 2006 23:28 GMT
> If acceleration and gravity are equivilent for "some" descriptive
> equations of GR, then is it correct to state that, a highly accelerated
> particle, is really a gravited particle? Particles accelerated to close
> to light speed gain Mass, thus gain Gravity.
>
> Or is it taht Mass and Gravity are equivilent at light velocities?
No.
What it means is that someone performing experiments can't tell the
difference *locally* between conducting those experiments in a
gravitational field and conducting those experiments in an accelerated
reference frame.
The accelerator operator is not in an accelerated frame of reference.
He can certainly tell the difference between a particle being
gravitated and one that is being accelerated.
PD