Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / October 2006

Field is a truely hard topic to understand and the basic harmonic
element is the cause.

A single field theory is divulged and the basic necessity appears the
true usage. Many, many fields are proposed and the same basic element
of discovery is either present or missing.

So I recommend trying to separate the urge to field theorize from the
basic drive to singlehandedly discover. A single theory is amazingly
more complicated than the harmonic state. A state of element to make
the electromagnetic angle is missing for instance. Why does the field,
right hand rule?

Hard stuff.

So my drive is to discover the element your field finds interestingly
unique. First glance quite nicely finds the harmonic of nature, and
this is well liked.  A harmonic as the field is another matter.

Try making harmonics in general in the correct Mathematica design. And
set define.
A first theory is then the cause of the appearance.  And this is just
for systems with harmonics.  Then try to define all systems of harmonic
behavior.  Hard stuff.

A basic fallasy is evident to prevent all state from harmomic
existence.  A cause to the relation of field to field. A different
field is then defined the relative field.  A basic first abstract
theory is then the idea.

So all relative field becomes the harmonic in relative state.

SO I advise trying harmonics, generalized, as study. A basic field then
becomes the thing to stay aways from because the cause as the theory is
the intended theory class.  A cause to universe is the level of
discussion on sci.physics.moderated.

Ask this question over there, "Can the field harmonic state cause?"

And the answer is supposed to be. "Only if you discover true odd nature
of field for the field harmonic is unknown."

So make Mathematica display the field then te harmonic then the
relative state to cause the outcome.  "States of twin paradox age."

A cause to levels of relative twin age is the discovery of your theory.
Promote it.

See.  "Given the twin paradox age difference what is the quantum state
of age level?"

Ask that over in sci.physics.

You have done a hard thing.  Theorised relative age!!! It is hard to
promote discovery, hang in there.

Your Eq. (2) has 1 - 2r0*r^(-1/x) but the 2d term is not
dimensionless. r^(1/x) is nonsense if x has length, or even if it
doesn't, a radius to a fractional power makes no sense. No good can
come of this.