Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / October 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Two protons

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Henry Haapalainen - 04 Oct 2006 23:36 GMT
If I tell you that two protons do not repel each other, would you think
that I am a lunatic? I told this in sci.physics.relativity, and the first
answers were that there should be millions of proofs against it. I
answered that I need only one. After a few days it became evident that there
is no research result against it (I had offered a reward of 1000 US dollars,
and I am sure that they tried hard).

Can modern physics really be that wrong! I have been accused of turning
physics inside out. I have
admitted that.

http://www.wakkanet.fi/~fields/

Henry Haapalainen
Autymn D. C. - 06 Oct 2006 09:08 GMT
> If I tell you that two protons do not repel each other, would you think
> that I am a lunatic? I told this in sci.physics.relativity, and the first
> answers were that there should be millions of proofs against it. I
> answered that I need only one. After a few days it became evident that there
> is no research result against it (I had offered a reward of 1000 US dollars,

why?  Where is He-2?
Henry Haapalainen - 06 Oct 2006 22:33 GMT
"Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:1160122100.381065.28870@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>> If I tell you that two protons do not repel each other, would you think
>> that I am a lunatic? I told this in sci.physics.relativity, and the first
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> why?  Where is He-2?

My English is not good, please explain your question more clearly.

Henry Haapalainen
Autymn D. C. - 07 Oct 2006 06:17 GMT
> "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> kirjoitti
> viestissä:1160122100.381065.28870@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> My English is not good, please explain your question more clearly.

That's not English; it's International.  He-2 is helium-2.
Y.Porat - 06 Oct 2006 09:58 GMT
> If I tell you that two protons do not repel each other, would you think
> that I am a lunatic? I told this in sci.physics.relativity, and the first
> answers were that there should be millions of proofs against it. I

----------------------
you are partially right
it is not **in all circumstances that two Protons repell each other!!

if it is just two of them they will repell
but.....
if they are a part of some nuclei
**they will not repell**

see some examples in my site:

http://www,geocities.com/porat_y/mypage.html

if you want me to pin point examples there i will do it
and i can even suggest  some explanations why it is so ...

ATB
Y.Porat
-----------------------------

> answered that I need only one. After a few days it became evident that there
> is no research result against it (I had offered a reward of 1000 US dollars,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Henry Haapalainen
Henry Haapalainen - 06 Oct 2006 22:34 GMT
Y Porat, your page could not be opened. HH

"Y.Porat" <maporat@012.net.il> kirjoitti
viestissä:1160125110.370544.243880@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

>> If I tell you that two protons do not repel each other, would you think
>> that I am a lunatic? I told this in sci.physics.relativity, and the first
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>>
>> Henry Haapalainen
Y.Porat - 07 Oct 2006 07:54 GMT
> Y Porat, your page could not be opened. HH
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> >>
> >> Henry Haapalainen
-----------------------------------
i wondr why
i write it from memory so may be a tiny typing slip
so let me try it again:

http://www.geocities.com/porat_y/mypage.html

please note
thke there the example of Iron nuc.
i preented it in two ways
1 the shoetened planar encryption
and beside it the easyer to the untrained people about 3d structures
in an isometric way that anyone can read and understand

the Protons ther are marked as while 'elipses'
and the Neutrons are markes as 'black ones'
npw the Alpha particle is marles as sort of a cross (planar for
simplicity while actually
it is a tetraheder of neotron neutyron and proton proton all of them
commected
in a 'point'
the edge  protons at eh edge (in cases they are there)   are connected
to
to an existing inner Alpha particle
so it is actually a connection of a proton
and a proton that belongs as well to a prpton of an Alpha particle
sounds complicated in words
but in a picture it is muchsimpler to understand and remember
9youremember much better pictures rather  than words

ATB
Y.Porat
-----------------
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.