Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / December 2006

the double-slit experiment is typically cited as empirical evidence of the
validity of Schrodinger's wave equation

BUT, the slit experiment, is ONE SIDED, it only proves the particle properties of waves,
NOT the wave properties of particles

in fact, since there is not even a hypothesis wherby the wave equation defaults to
Newtonian mechanics under certain circumstances, I highly doubt its validity

I think it is more likely that particles can only be characterized as waves, NOT be waves,
or exhibit wave properties, at least with the instrumental analysis we have today

for instance
amplitude is a power function - easily explained by momentum of particles
frequency - easily explained by flux of particles over time
wavelength - simply said, particles can have color, due to absorption or lack thereof

I suggest if you pipe the known accuracy and precision of today's measurement equipment,
into the wave equation, the probailities of phenomena would fall apart

what does this have to do with origins? validates entropy arguments against evolution,
since the wave equation is invalid

although, Schrodinger was VERY CORRECT, in his Copenhagen Interpretation, in that
you must consider the measurement appartus (observer) introduced into a system
as a valid variable

Cramer's Transactional interpretation, leads to infinite loops of feedback in time
mechanisms

Everett's Many Worlds Interpretation, leads to variances increasing, from a relatively
low level of variance

I suggest this all leads us to a consensual reality model of the universe, granted
our particular consents may not be important in every situation, BUT, the fact that
physics seem to exist in such concepts of space and time that have no fabric,
they are a subset of such by a ven diagram