> > So is the converse true, does spacetime exist within Atoms?..or is
> > there a difined limit?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> They are all conceptual objects not physical objects. I posit so too
> is space-time.
You are course correct, my posting which I now realize should have just
stipulated the product of just "space", and of course the answer would
have to be Yes.
Products inside of atoms have motion, they have to have trancend
through a space/volume , in order that they are not detected?
At what level (discrete/seperation) does spacetime lose its systematic
ability to describe non hidden objects?
I can reduce an Orange down to its component Atoms, I can reduce an
Atom down to its componant Quarks. But what I cannot do is Separate a
single Quark away from it's nearest neighbouring products?
I am asking, at what level does reduction cease, and separation
become's the relative discription?
Chris - 11 Jan 2007 10:15 GMT
Rubbish! quarks don't exist I just made them up for a joke.
I prefer scotch eggs myself.
>> > So is the converse true, does spacetime exist within Atoms?..or is
>> > there a difined limit?
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> I am asking, at what level does reduction cease, and separation
> become's the relative discription?