> I developed a fully geometrical representation of the Universe and am
> now explaining the Hypergeometrical Standard Model. The first
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Next, I will try to present one hyperon per day, until I am done... or
> tired...:)
Parallel metrics aren't dimensions. The mekanic ènèrjy and momentum
of a body depend on both its speed and liht's speed in a Pythagorean
relation, as they correspond to the magnetic and elèctric components
of action. A property and its derivativ are independent, so in a
bound sustem they show up as a pèrihodic with dimensions that are
parametric rather than òrthometric, as it were. You don't need a
fourth spatial dimension to store virtuals, potentials, or your
psèudocinetics.
The propagation of liht does not farere the univers; it only updates
the fields where there are bodies already. You should speak in terms
of the wavefront's gradient, not the curvature, as the univers doesn't
care what size it is. It is neither shut, nor open, nor ajar; the
vacuum is overall superrelativistic and Hubble flows fluctuat with
ambiplasmic diametric drift.
-Aut
http://flickr.com/photos/-1