> E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> Message posted via NatScience.com
> http://www.natscience.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/particle/200702/1
Well I've attempted to post to sci.physics.foundations but it did not
go through, using Google.
The contents of the message were not saved.
Your text acknowledgement of the equations is dropping some critical
accents.
As I stated before, I think the status quo is right in many matters.
Thus, the standard model and everything is still exactly the same.
Consider, for example, the convenience of standard units. Everything
basically works perfectly, the equations line up, in standard units.
So modern foundations is all the volumes on the library shelves that
describe it, Copenhagen and so on.
Here on sci.physics.particle, I describe in terms of the ghost pilot
wave with the emitter and so on: phase. You see: the speed of light
is constant, the c in the e = mc^2 is a constant. So, integrate over
them. (That's where the parastatistics is used.)
Uncle Al, over on sci.physics, describes it in quite detail, physics,
as is known in the universe. Luckily, it is not necessary to rely on
Uncle Al for that information. For example, consider other casual
posters to sci.physics.particle. I think they should feed the
abstracts right by, maybe an abstracts newsgroup of finished papers.
They have that already, Greg Kuperberg posts it to sci.math.research
and sci.physics.research etcetera. Is that right?
Me, I post on sci.logic, explaining A theory. It's the letter A, A
theory.
Warm regards,
Ross F.
--
Ross Finlayson
Finlayson Consulting