Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / March 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Light as discrete particles of energy

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Peter - 01 Mar 2007 19:31 GMT
Hello,

I am trying to understand the following statement on photoelectric
effect:

"When light shines on a metal, electrons are emitted. However,
electrons are emitted only at specifc threshold frequency."

I am guess the experimental setup is something as follows:

1. Shine light on a metal.
2. Start at a specific frequency of light.
3. Keep on increasing the frequency of light.
4. At discrete frequencies, you will see (not by naked eyes) eletrons
being emitted.

I would appreciate it if someone can help me understand some
fundamentals:

1. How do you go about changing the frequency of light?
2. Who is losing the electrons? The metal or the light?
3. I guess the atom gets decomposed into electrons and protons. What
happens to the protons?
4. In theory, if light continues to shine on a metal at a specifc
frequency, in a few billion years, the metal will disappear as it
continues to lose atoms. Is this correct?
5. Finally, just because electrons are being emitted at specific
frequencies, how do you conclude that light has discrete particles of
energy?

Thank you in advance for your help.

Pete
Autymn D. C. - 03 Mar 2007 10:59 GMT
1: prism?
2: the charges on either end
3: grabs other electròns in mètal
4: maybe
5: h is not a spread, that is.  At shorter stints and spans, the work
doesn't smear intom infinity.  So the fotòn isn't prima faciel a
multivalued being/doing.  It's a division of a wave, however, not a
particul.

-Aut
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.