Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / March 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Suriv - 16 Mar 2007 15:08 GMT
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"

    The Einsteinhoax Website was setup to counter an intellectual "fast
shuffle" which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily seen
to be a mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations Aether
Theory) to propagate the idea that our physical reality was too subtle to be
understood by mortal men and could only be dealt with using sophisticated
mathematics. This ploy served the academic community very well. The quote
was made that Dr. Einstein's principle contribution was not Special
Relativity but rather the showing that mathematics could used to make
advances in the physical sciences and "it was no longer necessary to wait
for "the few great minds that arise in each century" to make progress. Since
the availability of such intelligent men could not be expanded but
mathematics can be taught to anyone, the approach not only made the physical
sciences more mysterious, but allowed an unlimited expansion of the
contributing scientific community.

    The phenomena associated with both Special and General Relativity seem,
to a large degree, to be incomprehensible and the conclusions contradictory.
There is a simple reason for this. The explanations which are provided lead
the mind to recognize inherent contradictions which are not apparent in the
mathematics. Since the contradictions do not appear in the mathematics it
was considered obvious that did not exist! These contradictions have led to
the continuous confusion appearing in the Newsgroups and elsewhere. The
reality is that, when an expert(s) cannot explain his(their) knowledge to an
intelligent layman (laymen), there can only be one explanation. The
expert(s) do not actually understand their subject matter. IT IS NOT BECAUSE
OF THE LIMITATIONS OF THE LAYMEN.

"The Einstein Hoax"

    http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm was written to provide an
understanding of our physical reality which is in agreement with all known
physical observations and mathematical logic and , most importantly, pass
the "intelligent layman" test. The chapters of "The Einstein Hoax" are
listed below:

Chapter Titles

    1. - Introduction
    2. - Historical Background
    3. - The Nature of the Einstein Hoax
    4. - Does the Aether Exist?
    5. - The Resurrection of Absolute Velocity by Quantum Experiments
    6. - The Nature of Reality
    7. - Applying the Lorentz Transformations Properly
    8. - Generating the Gravity Transformations
    9. - Dr. Einstein's Error and the Introduction of Curved Space
    10. - Gravitational Contraction and Collapse
    11. - Gravitational Collapse and the Creation of a Universe
    12. - The Space Time Continuum
    13. - The Nature of Particles
    14. - Adding Quantum Effects to Our Understanding
    15. - Changing the Paradigms
    16. - What Can We Conclude?</h4>

There are 57,000 words and 53 illustrations.</h4>

"Gravity"

    A correct derivation of gravitational theory described is provided in
"Gravity" at http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity/htm. The test for its validity
is whether it agrees with both the results of observation and the results of
theoretical derivations. The material presented passes this test. It agrees
with the observations which are alleged to have verified General Relativity.
The Sun's gravitational field is about 5 orders of magnitude too weak to
reveal the difference between the two approaches. Observations of strong
gravitational fields, such as around neutron stars, cannot differentiate
between the theories without a close up observations of orbital parameters.
Such a verification must await the availability of Star Trek's Warp Drive.

    The advantage of the revised approach is that, among other results, it
reveals the source of gravitational energy (force), allows the total energy
of the Universe to remain constant over time, eliminates the idea of a
singularities (no black holes), and explains the creation of Universes. The
topics covered are:

Chapter Titles

    1: - Introduction
    2: - Laying the Groundwork
    3: - Evaluating the Gravitational Conversion Factors
    4: - Comparison with the "Real World"
    5: - The Complete Gravitational Field

    There are 50,000 words and 22 diagrams.</h4>

"Corrections to Errors in Special Relativity"

    This text is provided to correct residual errors in Special Relativity
by using the transformations provided by Special Relativity to eliminate the
rather foolish "Right Angle Lever Paradox" and to reveal the nature of
inertial mass.

Summary of "Corrections to Special Relativity"

    1.-  Introduction
    2.-  Groundwork of the Discussion
    3.-  A Comparison of the Velocity Difference Between Velocity
         Reference Frames B and C as Observed in Reference Frame B
         and as Observed in Reference Frame A
    4:-  Determination of the Lorentz Transformation for Incremental Mass
and
         for Force Between Reference Frames Having Relative Velocity
References
    5:-  The Balance of Moments Applied to a Right Angled Lever in Velocity
         Reference Frame B Moving with Velocity 'V' with Respect to
Velocity
         Reference Frame A as Observed in Reverence Frames A and B
    6:-  The Conventional Lorentz Transformation for Transverse Force as
         Related to the Right Angle Lever Thought Experiment
    7:-  The Lorentz Transformation for Parallel and Transverse Force as
         Related to a Compressed Spring Thought Experiment

    The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm 
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

    All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

    Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

    E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.

    The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.
Tom - 19 Mar 2007 16:15 GMT
Special relativity and General relativity are incompatible.  Special
relativity supposedly eliminated the idea of an aether. But general
relativity is an aether theory.  Special relativity requires that the
speed of light be a constant, but Einstein said that the speed of
light cannot be constant  in General relativity.

Einstein said that the wave function in q.m. cannot be a probability
distribution, it must be physical.  But if the wave it physical, it
must undergo a Doppler shift when observed by a moving observer.  But
then is the Doppler shift in addition to the relativistic contraction
or an addition to it??  So Einstein contradicts Einstein.  I believe
Einstein was correct in his argument with Bohr, the wave function is
physical.
Which means that Special Relativity is wrong.

But that doesn't mean GR is correct.  GR has no conservation laws.
Any conservation law in GR must be a symmetry of the metric, but the
introduction of matter destroys the symmetry.  But the conservation
laws control the motion of matter.  This seems to be fatal to the
basics of GR.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.