
Signature
Dale http://www.vedantasite.org
see website for real email address
On 7 6 , 8:51, Dale Kelly <THIS_IS_A_SPAMT...@vedantasite.org>
wrote:
> does the Transactional Interpretation (with advanced and retarded waves)
> hold up even considering Bell's Theorem?
>
> --
> Dalehttp://www.vedantasite.org
> see website for real email address
I believe that the future is determined entirely.
At the same time I believe that I can not know the future.
And I believe that there are local hidden variables.
The transactional Interpretation is directly related with "local
hidden variables".
A: "Bell's theorem denied local hidden variables."
Your question is "the sentence A is right, indeed or not?"
I noticed that there is an assumption in the Bell's theorem.
Assumption: "Local hidden variables are in the PARTICLES and NOT in
the SPACE."
If there were local hidden variables in the space, these variables
would act like the global variables.
The global variables seem like constant (for example, Planck's
constant).
Considering the constant like local hidden variables in the space,
Bell's theorem should be modified.
There are the same interference to the particles between point A and
point B.
Dale Kelly - 08 Jul 2007 07:58 GMT
> The transactional Interpretation is directly related with "local hidden
> variables".
I answered my own question, the advanced and retarded waves in the
Transactional Interpretation are global, not local, and Bell's Theorem
would not apply

Signature
Dale http://www.vedantasite.org
see website for real email address