Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / July 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Bell's theorem denied local hidden variables, indeed or not?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
tommiya - 08 Jul 2007 08:19 GMT
I believe that the future is determined entirely.
At the same time I believe that I can not know the future.
And I believe that there are local hidden variables.
For me, Einstein is the God.

A: "Bell's theorem denied local hidden variables."

My question is "the sentence A is right, indeed or not?"
I noticed that there is an assumption in the Bell's theorem.

Assumption: "Local hidden variables are in the PARTICLES and NOT in
the SPACE."

If there were local hidden variables in the space, these variables
would act like the global variables.
The global variables seem like constant (for example, Planck's
constant).
There are the same interference to the particles between point A and
point B.
Considering the constant like local hidden variables in the space,
Bell's theorem should be modified.

Summary:
There is an assumption in Bell's theorem.
The concept of local hidden variables is still alive.

Please tell me what is wrong.
tommiya - 10 Jul 2007 11:24 GMT
About the local hidden variables in the SPACE

"Light Quantum" was discovered by Einstein.
At the observation, every photons should have planck's constant.
Since photon can not stop, their energy is determined.
Not at the observation, they are only waves.

Here, I think that planck's constant belongs to the space.
At the observation, every particles should have planck's constant.
It means that there are the same interference from the space.

Consequently, assuming the same interference from the space,
"local hidden variables in the particles" are still alive.

Einstein is not the god, but a human being.
So "Light Quantum"  and SR are not independent with each other.
tommiya - 14 Jul 2007 08:33 GMT
I am sorry for my bad English, and the lack of professional knowledge.

a. local hidden variables
b. the same interference from the space at the observation

My Conclusion: QM = a + b
In bell's theorum, there are no concepts of b.
After the same interference, particles are observed.
The same interference is related with planck's constant.
Planck's constant belongs to the space.

How to make sure:
Change the local hidden variables before observation.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.