my proof of 3 and only 3 generations

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Al.Rivero@gmail.com - 09 Oct 2007 11:27 GMT

... and five light quarks.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.1526

Reply to this Message

Autymn D. C. - 22 Oct 2007 16:12 GMT

On Oct 9, 3:27 am, "Al.Riv...@gmail.com" <Al.Riv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> ... and five light quarks.
>
> http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.1526

"empiricall"
un- = de-

Reply to this Message

Al.Rivero@gmail.com - 22 Oct 2007 18:22 GMT

> On Oct 9, 3:27 am, "Al.Riv...@gmail.com" <Al.Riv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> "empiricall"
> un- = de-

Hmm, can I blame the spell checker? :-(

Reply to this Message

Al.Rivero@gmail.com - 22 Oct 2007 18:47 GMT

In any case, the meat is in section 3. Up to my knowledge, no theory -
fringe or standard- has been able to get n=3 from a simpler postulate.
The best traveling theories postulate a group wide enough to contain 3
generations and some Z_3 symmetry or some triality, but the group
itself is still a big postulate with a lot more of structure. Some
others need to postulate explicit compactification mechanisms and
manifolds in extra dimensions. This one, which I call sBootstrap, does
not add structure except perhaps two or three very massive charge 4/3
objects, and most probably they can be blocked under some symmetry
argument.

On Oct 22, 7:22 pm, "Al.Riv...@gmail.com" <Al.Riv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Oct 9, 3:27 am, "Al.Riv...@gmail.com" <Al.Riv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Hmm, can I blame the spell checker? :-(

Reply to this Message

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / October 2007

my proof of 3 and only 3 generations