A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 11 Oct 2007 18:22 GMT A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
If we accept that the nature of non-locality is described as an instantaneous exchange of "eigenstate" information and in addition can have different levels of action, THEN I postulate that the quantum mechanical universe is able to MIMIC relativity rules down to only a few anomalies, which should be measurable by experiment. The different levels of EPR action should be present between evaporated silver atoms inside a Stern Gerlach experiment, or inside a classic EPR experiment, or even at very long distance between ( anti)copy universes. See: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/ The consequence of this new model is, that the lightspeed in a complex way is related to the mass and gravity field of massive objects like the Earth.As a result, there is a relative simple possibility to check the ether DRAG at a mountain summit, by the diurnal distance variation measurements of single GPS satellite signals by a "single GPS- receiver". If the lightspeed around the Earth is dragged by gravity, then light rays that are "skimming the Earth" are supposed to be less influenced by the motion of the Earth. Thus GPS signals that are skimming the Earth surface are also less influenced and will show at least diurnal variation related to the orbital motion of the earth. There is perhaps even a chance to find "some" universal variation, as is measured by Dayton Miller .
See my proposal with sketch at: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-could-influ ence.html
Small lightspeed anomalies, are already measured at mountain summits in parallel direction with the Earth's orbital motion around the Sun by Dayton Miller ( 1925-1928) and Yuri Galaev (Ukrain) , however due to the very small variations, these results are still ignored by the mainstream.A second interesting way to measure the ether speed was performed by Y Galaev in 2002:THE MEASURING OF ETHER-DRIFT VELOCITY AND KINEMATIC ETHER ISCOSITY WITHIN OPTICAL WAVES BANDPublished: Spacetime and Substance, Vol.3, No.5 (15), 2002, P.207-224. Author: - Yuri Galaev, Ph.D.; Senior research officer of the Institute for Radiophysics & Electronics National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, and corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences (RANS). see:http://narod.yandex.ru/100.xhtml?www.spacetime.narod.ru/ 0015-pdf.zip Leo Vuyk
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 16 Oct 2007 20:14 GMT On Oct 11, 7:22 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming. > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > 0015-pdf.zip > Leo Vuyk My open letter dated 16 october 2007 to professor Langley.
Dear professor Langley,
I am aware of your magnificent work on high precision GPS Point positioning models. In my own -fully different- QM vacuum research, I came to surprising conclusions about the origin of strong outliers in GPS signals which are supported by your TOPEX-POSEIDON and CHAMP pseudorange residuals up to 5 meters, which I found inside articles mentioned below I came to the (anti-relativistic) conclusion, that the Earth's orbital speed, ca. 30 km/sec, should be incorporated in the GPS signal speed. The effect should be a GPS-LEO pseudorange residual decrease of max 3 meters. My vacuum model predict that; If GPS signals are not directly pointing into the surface of the massive gravitating Earth then the orbital speed of the Earth should be accounted for.
Thus for ground based receivers this is mostly not the case. On Earth, this effect should be measurable only on mountain summits or high riser buildings. (see attachment) and also on internet: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-could-influ ence.html and perhaps: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
ps. This is an open letter also visible on other locations.
I hope you like it.
Leo Vuyk.
Your articles which I see As a support of the vacuum effect mentioned above: Evaluation of High-Precision, Single-Frequency GPS Point Positioning Models (2001) http://gauss.gge.unb.ca/papers.pdf/iongnss2004.beran.pdf GPS Phase-Connected, Precise Point Positioning of Low Earth Orbiters (2004) http://gauss.gge.unb.ca/papers.pdf/gnss01.bisnath.pdf
by Tomas Beran, Sunil B. Bisnath and Richard B. Langley University of New Brunswick Ca.
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 30 Oct 2007 21:16 GMT On Oct 16, 8:14 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 11, 7:22 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 79 lines] > > - Show quoted text - There seems to be two different shaped LASOF ( local anti-symmetrical oscillating vacuum frame) lightspeed extinction envelopes, for A: Earth bound light sources and for B: Satellite- or space based light sources. Based on Radar reflection data of Venus and Mercury done by I.I Shapiro, I concluded, that for Earth bound light sources, the LASOF extinction envelope around the Earth, seems to be globular with a diameter of 70 million km. see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/gravity-dependent-lightspeed.html
Based on sparse Formosat- Champ- Topex satellite data in combination with the small anomalies measured by D.Miller ( 1926) and Y.Galaev, I suggest, that for space based light sources, the LASOF envelope seems to be ellipsoidal (or cigar shaped), with the major axis coinciding to the Earth-Satellite axis of the same length ( 70 MILLION KM) and an unknown minor axis. Future satellite-GPS distance reading variations should give information about the minor axis of the cigar shaped LASOF envelope. http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-could-influ ence.html
Leo Vuyk
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 06 Nov 2007 13:30 GMT On Oct 30, 9:16 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 16, 8:14 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 103 lines] > > - Show quoted text - For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/gravity-dependent-lightspeed.html
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 06 Nov 2007 14:02 GMT On Nov 6, 2:30 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 30, 9:16 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 110 lines] > > - Show quoted text - For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/g ravity-dependent- lightspeed.html
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 07 Nov 2007 12:49 GMT On Nov 6, 3:02 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2:30 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 118 lines] > > - Show quoted text - "Short Period Quasi-Regular Oscillations" of Venus and Mercury of about 30 days, are described by I.I Shapiro in Radar Astronomy 1968, page 170-172. see at the end of the file mentioned below. Examples of QPOs (Quasi Periodic Oscillations) or Orbital Periodicities of Binaries are supposed to be examples of gravity influenced LASOF lightspeed anomalies just like Venus and Mercury. see below articles by: H.Lehmann, (Binary RZ-cas.) and P.G.Ostrov, (Binary HV 2543). http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-could-influ ence.html
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 09 Nov 2007 04:50 GMT On Nov 7, 1:49 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 6, 3:02 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 131 lines] > > - Show quoted text - To get more clarity about the key arguments I am using for my LASOF idea, I searched and found new impressive data. It is a clear example that GPS signals skimming the earth passing near or at Higher altitudes, are less related to the earth frame and more by the Solar frame. In this case (CHAMP) providing outliers of 200 meters. A clear example of GPS signal failures for the CHAMP Low Earth Orbiters at 430 km altitude, is one of the reasons that so called Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination (POD) by GPS readings is not possible. Several other ground based systems and complex computer programs are needed to compensate these errors. However, if the LASOF idea about gravity (or Mass) related lightspeed is incorporated in the GPS readings, then these errors are supposed to vanish for a great deal. I made a copy with my comment see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-could-influ ence.html
The information described above was found in "Near real time Precise orbit determination of low earth satellites etc. pdf page 85, by:Tae- Suk-Bae 2006. Ohio state university. See: http://www.ceegs.ohio-state.edu/gsreports/reports/report_481.pdf
Leo Vuyk.
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 09 Nov 2007 05:58 GMT On Nov 9, 5:50 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 1:49 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 157 lines] > > - Show quoted text - My conclusion is still, that the reference frames of the planets (Earth) and Sun are interfering in smooth way what I dubbed a LASOF (Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame). The LASOF influences the quality of GPS signals if they are not travelling into (or away from) the Earth surface and if they are passing the Earth at a larger distance. The LASOF influences also the speed of the outgoing signals from Earth (like radar signals to Venus) and the additional speed (C+/-v ) will become extinct after 70 million km from Earth.
Leo Vuyk. http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
|
|
|