Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / November 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Hypergeometrical Formula for the Permittivity of Vaccum

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ny2292000 - 27 Oct 2007 13:35 GMT
As some of you might know, at lest a few of few might know, the
Permittivity of Vacuum and its counterparty Vacuum Magnetic
Susceptibility are Cosmological Constants (not unlike the speed of
light)...  They cannot be calculated from first principles...:)  in
all other theories...

In the Hypergeometrical Universe Model, they are easily calculated
using a simple formula.

Here is the link:

http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com/2007/10/miguel-de-unamuno.html

The theory can be found on the link to paper on that blog.

Please fell free to ask any questions or to post any comments...:)

Cheers,

MP
Josef Matz - 30 Oct 2007 15:41 GMT
Wrong all that

The permittivity of vacuum is a definition that was taken with the current
unit Ampere. In MKS system is 4 pi times a 10 - potenz.

In cgs its 1 isnt it ?

Josef

> As some of you might know, at lest a few of few might know, the
> Permittivity of Vacuum and its counterparty Vacuum Magnetic
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Here is the link:

http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com/2007/10/miguel-de-unamuno.html

> The theory can be found on the link to paper on that blog.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> MP
ny2292000 - 01 Nov 2007 04:30 GMT
> Wrong all that
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Josef,

You should your research at Wikipedia before saying something
stupid...:)

Cheers,

MP

ps- by the way, I used SI...  just in case you can't figure that
out...and 4Pi x 10^-7 is the vacuum magnetic susceptibility in MKS...
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/PermeabilityofFreeSpace.html

The permittivity  is given by
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/PermittivityofFreeSpace.html

Notice the lack of formulae for those quantities...:)
Josef Matz - 01 Nov 2007 15:44 GMT
Can you tell me for what it shall be good for to express a number like 4
times pi by other physical quantities ?

Josef

> > Wrong all that
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> >
> > Josef

some of you might know, at lest a few of few might know, the
> > > Permittivity of Vacuum and its counterparty Vacuum Magnetic
> > > Susceptibility are Cosmological Constants (not unlike the speed of
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Notice the lack of formulae for those quantities...:)
ny2292000 - 02 Nov 2007 00:22 GMT
> Can you tell me for what it shall be good for to express a number like 4
> times pi by other physical quantities ?
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dear Josef,

I will not throw stones on your glass house...  since I mistype things
every so often... Please, restate what you've just asked because I
cannot understand what are you trying to ask...:)

"> Can you tell me for what it shall be good for to express a number
like 4
> times pi by other physical quantities ?"

By the way, English is not my first language either...:)

Cheers,

MP
Josef Matz - 05 Nov 2007 10:46 GMT
Ok

Josef

> > Can you tell me for what it shall be good for to express a number like 4
> > times pi by other physical quantities ?
> >
> > Josef

Oct 30, 10:41 am, "Josef Matz" <josefm...@arcor.de> wrote:
> > > > Wrong all that
> >
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
>
> MP
ny2292000 - 20 Nov 2007 18:38 GMT
> Can you tell me for what it shall be good for to express a number like 4
> times pi by other physical quantities ?
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Joseph,

The higher the number of parameters (Cosmological Constants) the
weaker is the theory.

If I were to tell you that g=9.81 m/s^2   you wouldn't ask me the
question why should Newton bother with the Law of Gravitation - we
already know the acceleration due to Gravity..>:)

The fact that Newton's discovered the Gravitation Law means that now
you can apply that law to the whole Universe and understand the
Cosmos..

Now you should be able to see that understanding the innerworks of
parameters is profound.  I was able to calculate the permittivity of
vaccuum, the magnetic susceptiblity of vacuum and Newton's
Gravitational Constant.  I also provided a new meaning (a geometric
one) for Planck's Constant.

Think how much insight that kind of model could bring...:)

Calculating from first principles Cosmological Consntants that Mankind
didn't have a hope to figure out is a relevant achievement for any
theory.

Please visit the site and leave your comments.
http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com

Cheers,

MP

ps- 4 time pi is a definition.  It is not a measured value...:)  Just
in case you, like many people out there,  think that there is a
cosmological constant out there that can be expressed as a function of
pi or or has a predilection towards SI or CGS..:)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.