Every body seems to be convinced that "NO FORCE IS ACTING ON AN OBJECT
IN FREE FALL" however , the Flyby anomaly is a support for the
opposite.
In his book "the Character of Physical Law" (p.37-39), Richard Feynman
wrote: "Suppose that in the world everywhere there are a lot of (space
filling vacuum-) particles, flying through us at very high speed. They
come equally from all directions, -just shooting by- and once in a
while they hit us in a bombardment. We and the sun, are practically
transparent for them. Practically, but not completely, and some of
them hit. Look at what would happen; If the earth is moving it is
running into the particles coming towards it and away from the ones
that are chasing it from behind. So more particles will hit from the
front than from the back, and there will be a (vacuum) force opposing
any motion. This force would slow the earth up in its orbit" (which is
proved to be not the case); so that is the end of that theory;.! Well
you say, it was a good one, and I got rid of the mathematics for a
while, maybe I could invent a better one".
However, in "Crazy" contrast with Richard Feynman this new model
assumes that Nature may compensate such an opposing vacuum resistance
by a "Fifth Force",
1: if the Feynman vacuum particles are supposed to be energetic
oscillating vacuum particles coined "Higgs-Virgin Particles"
oscillating in a chiral 3D lattice and
2: if the mass carrying particles (of the Earth) have the ability, by
real Lorentz transformations, to absorb just enough energy of this
oscillating vacuum frame in the right direction to compensate for the
opposing vacuum resistance and to keep this Lorentz polarization in
its memory. A fifth force is born: the directional vacuum energy
absorption, a base for new physics.
The directional vacuum energy absorption is supposed to be possible by
real "Lorentz transformations" of charged particles relative to the
local vacuum reference frame. These reference frame related Lorentz
transformations are coined "Lorentz polarization" which act as a
memory, in combination with the described Dual Universal EPR
correlation. This memory system as a whole is called: "Big Bang
Entanglement" (BBE). Big Bang Entanglement is supposed to be the
instantaneous non-local collapse information between "Lorentz
polarized" "Twin" particles with charge, and between "Twin" photonic
oscillatory vacuum information packets living in two spatial separated
Universes. Thus it is postulated, that the Earth is pushed by the
oscillating particles of the vacuum as a compensation for the
resistance originated by the Earth's velocity through the vacuum
reference frame itself: VACUUM ACTION IS REACTION IN A VERY PECULIAR
WAY, BASED ON THE CONE-PROPELLER FORM OF FERMIONS! This Vacuum
Reference Frame is supposed to be anchored around the sun itself, by
two medium sized "Stellar Anchor black holes" in dumbbell form
situated on both sides of the planetary plane. "Function Follows
Form".
On 25 nov, 14:42, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Leo Vuyk.
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 26 Nov 2007 15:20 GMT
On Nov 25, 8:28 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Every body seems to be convinced that "NO FORCE IS ACTING ON AN OBJECT
> IN FREE FALL" however , the Flyby anomaly is a support for the
[quoted text clipped - 87 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
No, I was not aware of the existence of multi monopole moments.
But I agree, that my photons are monopole photons for electric ( plus
and minus) and magnetic ( North and South) interactions.
For gravity I only use one graviton, which is only able to produce a
force in combination with a Higgs collision on fermions. See:
I could advise you to concentrate on two parts of my webblog:
A; Rigid Elementary Click-On Particles, Propellers and Fields
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/01/introduction.html
and:
The CPT symmetric Multiverse, Occam's razor and Lee Smolin's Trouble
with Physics.
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/03/backreaction-lee-smolins-troubl
e-with.html
Leo Vuyk.
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/