Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / January 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Why is mass^2 "proportional" to total angular momentum in mesons     (Regge theory)?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
frank_k_sheldon@yahoo.co.uk - 19 Jan 2008 09:54 GMT
Regge theory states that mass m and angular momentum J
are related by
m^2 ~ c+d*J
for mesons of similar properties. It s also states that this
has to do with the elongated shape of mesons.
Can somebody explain this in simple physics?

I do not seem to find a simple explanation on the
internet - only research papers.

Thanks in advance!

Frank
Mirror Space - 20 Jan 2008 08:06 GMT
On Jan 19, 11:54 am, frank_k_shel...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> Regge theory states that mass m and angular momentum J
> are related by
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Frank

Hi Frank it is not obeyed  this relation anymore!
You should look into my seminal papers, like Physical Review D, v.63,
054023
(2001), and also my sole Review at ArXiv: hep-ph/0110160 - 90 pages,
where you will find REAL answers to all your queries!

Sincerely Andy Inopin, PhD from 1983
frank_k_sheldon@yahoo.co.uk - 20 Jan 2008 17:59 GMT
> On Jan 19, 11:54 am, frank_k_shel...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Sincerely Andy Inopin, PhD from 1983

Well, as I said, I do not seem to find a simple explanation.
This review is another example of complicated explanations
for a simple fact.

It may well be that the relation is not exactly linear.
But why is it almost linear in the first place?

Frnk
Autymn D. C. - 21 Jan 2008 15:06 GMT
The bondlength must shrink as much?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.