On Jan 19, 11:54 am, frank_k_shel...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> Regge theory states that mass m and angular momentum J
> are related by
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Frank
Hi Frank it is not obeyed this relation anymore!
You should look into my seminal papers, like Physical Review D, v.63,
054023
(2001), and also my sole Review at ArXiv: hep-ph/0110160 - 90 pages,
where you will find REAL answers to all your queries!
Sincerely Andy Inopin, PhD from 1983
frank_k_sheldon@yahoo.co.uk - 20 Jan 2008 17:59 GMT
> On Jan 19, 11:54 am, frank_k_shel...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Sincerely Andy Inopin, PhD from 1983
Well, as I said, I do not seem to find a simple explanation.
This review is another example of complicated explanations
for a simple fact.
It may well be that the relation is not exactly linear.
But why is it almost linear in the first place?
Frnk
The bondlength must shrink as much?