Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / April 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Robert Karl Stonjek - 27 Apr 2008 03:47 GMT
Hi Guys,
I was just thinking about protium the other day and it occurred to me that
as it has only one proton and no neutron, there must be no W and Z
particles.  This raised a couple of quick questions:
1) when protium becomes Deuterium, ie one proton and one neutron, where do
the W and Z particles come from?
2) if they come from the proton and/or neutron, does the mass of these
particles change ie is the mass of the proton in protium greater than when
in any other atom?
3) where do the W and Z particles go when Deuterium decays?

I assume that they are some kind of virtual particle (boson), but that
answer does not seem to be entirely satisfactory

Signature

Kind Regards
Robert Karl Stonjek

d.086@hotmail.com - 28 Apr 2008 05:03 GMT
On Apr 26, 7:47 pm, "Robert Karl Stonjek" <ston...@ozemail.com.au>
wrote:

> 3) where do the W and Z particles go when Deuterium decays?

Could you please say more about Deuterium decay in terms of
observables? I've always considered deuterium to be a stable isotope.
I have never practiced any special precautions when handling
deuterated compounds. Was I wrong?
Robert Karl Stonjek - 28 Apr 2008 06:47 GMT
> 3) where do the W and Z particles go when Deuterium decays?

Could you please say more about Deuterium decay in terms of
observables? I've always considered deuterium to be a stable isotope.
I have never practiced any special precautions when handling
deuterated compounds. Was I wrong?

RKS:
It is my understanding that all elements decay except iron.  On further
thought, Deuterium decays into helium (discussed in the context of
hypothetical fusion reactors and I have seen it discussed with respect to
biological reactions, but I know little of the details of this).

Even so, there is most probably some condition under which a deuterium atom
will lose a neutron ie "deuterium stripping".

If such stripping occurs, what happens to the W and Z particles?  Or, in a
similar vein, where do the W and Z particles come from when deuterium forms
(I understand that most of it formed in the big bang).

Robert

PS for all practical purposes, deuterium is stable (not that you were about
to panic on my say so :)
d.086@hotmail.com - 28 Apr 2008 08:12 GMT
On Apr 27, 10:47 pm, "Robert Karl Stonjek" <ston...@ozemail.com.au>
wrote:

> If such stripping occurs, what happens to the W and Z particles?  Or, in a
> similar vein, where do the W and Z particles come from when deuterium forms
> (I understand that most of it formed in the big bang).

I think you need to distinguish between observables and non-
observables. When you replace the proton for the deuteron in heavy
water you have a set of observable property changes. The extra neutron
in the deuteron has mass so you can easily measure a differerent
density, for example. I don't think it is worth asking existential
questions about particles that are not observable. That's just me, I'm
a practitioner of the black arts that work. Call me an engineer if you
wish. I'm no theoretical speculative philosopher.
Robert Karl Stonjek - 28 Apr 2008 17:44 GMT
> If such stripping occurs, what happens to the W and Z particles? Or, in a
> similar vein, where do the W and Z particles come from when deuterium forms
> (I understand that most of it formed in the big bang).

I think you need to distinguish between observables and non-
observables. When you replace the proton for the deuteron in heavy
water you have a set of observable property changes. The extra neutron
in the deuteron has mass so you can easily measure a differerent
density, for example. I don't think it is worth asking existential
questions about particles that are not observable. That's just me, I'm
a practitioner of the black arts that work. Call me an engineer if you
wish. I'm no theoretical speculative philosopher.

RKS:
I just assumed that this was a well trodden path that was well researched
and had ready answers to the questions I posed - they seemed fairly straight
forward.

If we compare the question on W and Z to another Boson, say the photon, the
answers are all reasonably straight forward - an electron emitting a photon
loses an amount of energy equal to that taken off by the photon.  Upon
absorbing a photon, an electron gains energy.  Thus the energy-mass of the
electron does change.

I thought there might be an answer along the same lines for the W and Z ~
didn't realise I had to venture into a lab and weigh up the little fellers
for myself.

Robert
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.