Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / July 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

field theory and electron with finite radius

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
alistair - 26 Jul 2004 11:22 GMT
What if an electron has a radius - how could a quantum field theory be
built from this idea?
Here's one idea.We look for something invariant:
Let's use the  idea of  (mass x length) = constant.
We take into account length contraction - shortening of electron
radius - for observers moving at different speeds

Is the contraction to zero radius at c a problem?
If so then we can guess how to stop it.
One way would be just to write:

LENGTH = Rest Length x ( 1-v^2/c^2 + small constant)^1/2

(this constant would be 10^ -36 metres at most because when v = c
length becomes (10^-36)^1/2 = 10^ -18 which is the distance to which
particle accelerators have just reached.

if mass  =  m0 / ( 1-v^2/c^2 + small constant)^1/2

then:
(mass x length) = m0  / ( 1-v^2/c^2 + small constant)  x

Rest Length x ( 1-v^2/c^2 + small constant)^1/2

= m0 x Rest length = constant

The small constant would mean that mass does not become infinite
but that it reaches a finite value and so rest masses can,in principle
be accelerated to the speed of light.
alistair - 26 Jul 2004 21:06 GMT
> (this constant would be 10^ -36 metres at most because when v = c
> length becomes (10^-36)^1/2 = 10^ -18 which is the distance to which
> particle accelerators have just reached.

CORRECTION:

this constant would be 10^- 38 metres because for time dilation
this would give a maximum which is 10^19 seconds for a stationary
clock, for each second of a clock moving at the speed of light with
respect to a stationary clock. Time dilation can't be more than the
age of the universe which is about 10^19 seconds at present.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.