 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2008My excellent, mercifully brief treatment of Relativity
My 1-page briefing explaining Relativity can be read at http://placido.u21.0web-hosting.com/kavs/kjs/briefingetr.html On the last line of that text is a link to my fuller treatment of the topic, 14 pages in length with a couple of diagrams. My site has no cookies or ads or hidden scripting -- nothing like that, as you'll soon see. It's there just for cerebral enjoyment; 'hope you enjoy it plenty. | My 1-page briefing explaining Relativity can be read at | http://placido.u21.0web-hosting.com/kavs/kjs/briefingetr.html [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] | see. | It's there just for cerebral enjoyment; 'hope you enjoy it plenty. <yawn> Hello Earthling. Please answer me this question. Why did your fellow ape Einstein say the speed of light from A to B is c-v, the speed of light from B to A is c+v, the "time" each way is the same? What do you Earthlings do when you encounter the insane? Do you shoot them as you should for your cerebral enjoyment, cretin? > | My 1-page briefing explaining Relativity can be read at > | http://placido.u21.0web-hosting.com/kavs/kjs/briefingetr.html [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > the speed of light from B to A is c+v, > the "time" each way is the same? HELL if I know! Maybe he slugged down a few too many the night prior! Possible reasons for a man making a goofy statement conceive to the myriad. That goes without saying - and I am not obliged to be answerable for the utterances of some historical figure and/or that figure's rationale. Because none of that is in context about the *principles* of Relativity, which existed long before Einstein, ie. always. The fundaments of said principles are laid forth in my documents. > What do you Earthlings do when you encounter the insane? > Do you shoot them as you should for your cerebral enjoyment, cretin? It's not about personages; relativity is factual. You're all-greek-to-me, Androcles. | > | My 1-page briefing explaining Relativity can be read at | > | http://placido.u21.0web-hosting.com/kavs/kjs/briefingetr.html [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] | | HELL if I know! Maybe he slugged down a few too many the night prior! Score 9/10 for an accurate assessment of the prior cause. However, no later correction was made and therefore he must have remained permanently inebriated. The correct answer is: He was raving mad. | Possible reasons for a man making a goofy statement conceive to the myriad. That goes | without saying - and I am not obliged to be answerable for the utterances of some | historical figure and/or that figure's rationale. Because none of that is in context | about the *principles* of Relativity, which existed long before Einstein, ie. always. Fair enough. | The fundaments of said principles are laid forth in my documents. Which is one page. Hardly "documents" plural, and contains the statement "Contradictory it’s not" which is certainly is. Hell if you know. > | about the *principles* of Relativity, which existed long before Einstein, > ie. always. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > statement "Contradictory it's not" which is certainly is. > Hell if you know. The portion that contains that citation is my 14-page fuller treatise, linked to from the 1-pager. I repeat with emphasis about relativity -- for I know -- CONTRADICTORY IT'S NOT Never mind Androcles; others I invite to learn from http://placido.u21.0web-hosting.com/kavs/kjs/briefingetr.html and following. | > | about the *principles* of Relativity, which existed long before Einstein, | > ie. always. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] | the 1-pager. | I repeat with emphasis about relativity -- for I know -- CONTRADICTORY IT'S NOT Obviously you have no idea what "contradictory" means. Hell if you know. | Never mind Androcles; others I invite to learn from <snip crap> Repeat with emphasis as much as you like, I invite you to answer the question Why did Einstein say the speed of light from A to B is c-v, the speed of light from B to A is c+v, the "time" each way is the same? Hell if you know. I'll give you a hint: It's contradictory. > Repeat with emphasis as much as you like, I invite you to > answer the question > Why did Einstein say [yada-yada snipt] 'Been smokin' that stuff again, mister? You're all-greek-to-me, Androcles But, enough said | > Repeat with emphasis as much as you like, I invite you to | > answer the question [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] | | But, enough said You are soon dealt with. f.ck off. *plonk* > Repeat with emphasis as much as you like, I invite you to > answer the question > Why did Einstein say [yada-yada snipt] 'Been smokin' that stuff again, mister? You're all-greek-to-me, Androcles But, enough said >>>>Meow. To which Androcles retorted: >>> Hiss! <spit> <spit> After which, Ben Bean replied with: >> REOWRRRRRRLLL!!! To which Androcles uttered in conclusion: >mmmmmrrrrrrrrr.... <HISS! HISS!> <swish> <slash> <spit> I love mature, intelligent debate among fellow scientific-types. ;-) | >>>>Meow. | [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] | | I love mature, intelligent debate among fellow scientific-types. ;-) Of course you do, which is why you've joined in. <snarl> However .... http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/SR.GIF SR can probably be used if there is no gravity. Else it is totally worthless, carry on using Newtonian Mechanics. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.