 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2008Unity between Relativity & Quantum Mechanics?
Premise/ Posulate Light cones are in fact geometrical boundaries of the universe. We are in a geometrically closed/boarded space relative to time and the spatial dimensions. since nothing limits extra dimensions including time, we are so to speak in a black hole relative to the infinity of possibilities. QM is the result of an object hitting the boundary of this spatial enclosure and consequently flattening out so to speak as to paint the entire geometric boundary and being everywhere relative to it, but at certain places with greater certainty. This flattening out is observed as electro magnetic radiation. objects with appreciable mass can never reach this boundary due to the limiting laws of special reality, and the infinite energy required. Michael Breach | Premise/ Posulate | Light cones are in fact geometrical boundaries of the universe. Idiots who say "in fact" are in fact lying to convince only themselves, in fact, and that's a fact. Your statement is f.cking ridiculous, you drooling cretin. Don't retort with gibberish. Intelligently address this premise. | Don't retort with gibberish. Intelligently address this premise. The f.cking premise is gibberish! On Jul 10, 11:38 pm, mqu...@erie.net wrote: > Premise/ Posulate > Light cones are in fact geometrical boundaries of the universe. We are [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Michael Breach Lovely handwaving in a sort of semiscientific, impressionist-painting sort of way. But there are problems... First of all, no massive object can travel on its light cone, let alone impact it from the interior of the light cone. Such a world line that intersects point A and then at some later time impacts the wall of the light cone with apex at A will have necessarily had a velocity greater than c. This is of course verboten, by the very nature of a light cone. > On Jul 10, 11:38 pm, mqu...@erie.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Thank you, the first intelligent response in this chain! I thought I implied your point when I said it would require an object with appreciable mass infinite energy to reach this boundary ("it's light cone) |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.