 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2008If you are superior in creativity department everybody here wishes that you fail
Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so she could judge me for it. I won at life. She didn't. Neither have you. Mitch Raemsch > Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so > she could judge me for it. > > I won at life. She didn't. Then neither did you, since she lost by marrying you. > Neither have you. Posting your random thoughts to usenet does not establish your standing in the "creativity department". And if you knew anything about Science, you would know that it advances by having others attack your quantitative claims. They don't seek make you a failure, Nature does that, but they seek to see if your pot holds water. David A. Smith > > Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so > > she could judge me for it. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > David A. Smith I am ahead of my time Smith. Medioce mind Smith. Mitch Raemsch >>>Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so >>>she could judge me for it. [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Medioce mind Smith. That may well be but that doesn't make him wrong in his assessment of your conduct. Your pot doesn't hold water. > >>>Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so > >>>she could judge me for it. [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > - Show quoted text - The same applies to you san. Mitch Raemsch >>>>>Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so >>>>>she could judge me for it. [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > The same applies to you san. Very very good! Now here's a gold star for you to add to those your teacher gives to for showing up to class with clean hands, brushed teeth, and combed hair. I know it's going to turn out that you're 7 years old. That's the quality of your "science" and your retorts. > >>>>>Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so > >>>>>she could judge me for it. [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > I know it's going to turn out that you're 7 years old. > That's the quality of your "science" and your retorts. Mind you, if that's Jupiter years it ain't so bad. > >>>Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so > >>>she could judge me for it. [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > That may well be but that doesn't make him wrong in his > assessment of your conduct. Your pot doesn't hold water. My bladder doesn't hold water!!!!!!!!!!! > I am ahead of my time Smith. > > Medioce mind Smith. > > Mitch Raemsch Got those two Nobel prizes yet? Yeah I thought not! But what I want to know is just WHAT would marry you? Are you gay, perchance? > > Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so > > she could judge me for it. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > your pot holds water. > David A. Smith. The majority of math had no application prior to it invention. And has none now! -- foolsrushin.' >>>Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so >>>she could judge me for it. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > The majority of math had no application > prior to it invention. And has none now! Are you certain that you can invent an equation that has no relevance at all to anything in nature? Dear foolsrushin. ... > The majority of math had no application > prior to it invention. And has none now! Ever note how the pyramid's base was pi times their height? The Egyptians had no mathematics to describe the result a priori. Do you ever buy meat or vegetables? Do you have a home loan? Do you have money in a savings account? Have you ever suffered through what passes for health care these days? Math has applications today, being merely an extension of logic. And I know you are just trolling... David A. Smith > Dear foolsrushin. > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > And I know you are just trolling... Amazing. The idiot posted this on a computer using networks. It might be an interesting exercise to code the DNS layer using only compare machine instructions. Even that is a form of logic using truth tables. /BAH Dear foolsrushin. On Jul 17, 10:42 pm, "foolsrushin." <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote: ... > The majority of math had no application > prior to it invention. And has none now! Ever note how the pyramid's base was pi times their height? The Egyptians had no mathematics to describe the result a priori. Do you ever buy meat or vegetables? Do you have a home loan? Do you have money in a savings account? Have you ever suffered through what passes for health care these days? Math has applications today, being merely an extension of logic. And I know you are just trolling... David A. Smith Do you mean the length of the side of the base? Coincidence? or was Egyptian maths much better than people usually suspect? And what would be the reason for choosing pi? Geopelia >Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so she could judge >me for it. > >I won at life. She didn't. Neither have you. I wish you to fail. Utterly and miserably. Maybe that will make you read few textbooks and stop your stupid incessant posts that do nothing but illustrate your ignorance of just just about everything. > In article <0f5d0bd5-02a9-44fc-82d6-80d71103b...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > incessant posts that do nothing but illustrate your > ignorance of just just about everything. He has already failed "utterly and miserably." He just doesn't realize it yet. |> In article <0f5d0bd5-02a9-44fc-82d6-80d71103b...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote: | > >Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so she could judge | > >me for it. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] | He has already failed "utterly and miserably." He just doesn't realize | it yet. What's up, Fuckhead Shubert, can't answer the question? Unfortunately, that kind of inventiveness has nothing to do with understanding physics and everything to do with the fuckin' bullshit of which the psychotic egotistical bastard, Lamenting Shubert, is most capable. One of the impossible breakfasts imagined is: the speed of light from A to B is c-v, the speed of light from B to A is c+v, the "time" each way is the same! Why did the lunatic Einstein say that, Fuckhead Shubert? > the speed of light from A to B is c-v, > the speed of light from B to A is c+v, > the "time" each way is the same! > > Why did the lunatic Einstein say that, Fuckhead Shubert? Please explain why your are so totally insane and possessed with telling the same lie over and over again. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/f61e0b1d 2daf3f07 | > the speed of light from A to B is c-v, | > the speed of light from B to A is c+v, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] | Please explain why your are so totally insane and possessed with | telling the same lie over and over again. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/f61e0b1d 2daf3f07 Please explain why you'RE so totally insane and possessed with telling the same seven "derivations" over and over again (and answer my question, fuckhead). the speed of light from A to B is c-v, the speed of light from B to A is c+v, the "time" each way is the same! Why did the lunatic Einstein say that, Fuckhead Shubert? >> In article >> <0f5d0bd5-02a9-44fc-82d6-80d71103b...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, BURT [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > He has already failed "utterly and miserably." He just doesn't realize > it yet. Its sad that somone would wish someone else to fail. Better to wish them to learn. Pete >>> In article >>> <0f5d0bd5-02a9-44fc-82d6-80d71103b...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Pete Don't wish other to fail. Wish to success, yourself. Geopelia >>>> In article >>>> <0f5d0bd5-02a9-44fc-82d6-80d71103b...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Geopelia Oops, that should be succeed, yourself Your ingenuity is very much like that notable character that could imagine six impossible things every morning before breakfast. Unfortunately, that kind of inventiveness has nothing to do with understanding physics. Shubee http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/directory.htm > Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so she could judge > me for it. Do you really know that little about people? We wish failure upon the arrogant, not the creative. > I won at life. She didn't. Neither have you. Let me guess: you appointed yourself referee.  Signature--Bryan > > Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so she could judge > > me for it. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > -- > --Bryan You don't know women bryan. Mitch Raemsch >>> Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so she could judge >>> me for it. >> Do you really know that little about people? We wish failure >> upon the arrogant, not the creative. >> >>> I won at life. She didn't. Neither have you. >> Let me guess: you appointed yourself referee. > > You don't know women bryan. On that, Mitch, you are mostly correct. Given how you describe your marriage, clearly you are no expert on that subject either. Hope things improve. Signature--Bryan > >>> Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so she could judge > >>> me for it. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > -- > --Bryan I know exactly what I am dealing with. She is always right never wrong. I never let my wife have her way and I am an expert at it. Mitch Raemsch > Kind of like my wife. Secretly wishing I would fail so she could judge > me for it. > > I won at life. She didn't. Neither have you. Just a couple of comments: 1. I don't know any way to "win at life". Life is not something you win or lose at, as far as I know. It's entirely possible that you failed at making your wife happy, but I wouldn't equate that with failing at life. 2. In the context of sci.physics and sci.physics.relativity, creativity doesn't buy a lot on its own. Psychopaths and schizophrenics and crazed starving artists are creative but that doesn't buy a lot in physics. Now, being creative AND being right, and knowing how to find out whether the latter is true -- THAT is rewarded. 3. So far, you haven't demonstrated a lot of creativity in sci.physics and sci.physics.relativity, and you SURE haven't demonstrated that you know how to find out if you're right. PD |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.