> It is often claimed that the cosmological constant is off by 120
> orders of magnitude (or 30 orders on a linear scale). The argument
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> effect is an unphysical approximation, which effectively amounts to
> setting alpha = infinity. Any thoughts?
Last year I was at a colloquium where Jaffe presented this point of view
and did a very good job of justifying it. Hendrik Casimir himself
derived the attraction between conducting plates by studying
van der Waals forces between molecues that are far enough away for
relativistic retardation effects to be dominant. Jaffe's article you
cite does a good job of explaining some of the details. Curiously, if
you bring the conducting plates too close to each other, then regular
van der Waals forces take over (with a different power law I believe).
Also, Jaffe and his students have developped an approximation technique
that allows calculation of Casimir forces between conducting surfaces of
various shapes. They've compared their results to more traditional
numerical simulations and get agreement. There are also some experiments
measuring these forces between real materials (look up articles by
Klimchitskaya and Mostepanenko).
Igor
From palmtree117@juno.com Fri Mar 25 17:03:14 2005
Path: z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Received: from imap.uwo.ca [129.100.0.43]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-6.2.5)
for igor@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:03:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from kam.its.uwo.ca ([129.100.254.76])
by chico.mail.uwo.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-1 (built Feb 24
2005)) with ESMTP id <0IDX00FZK7SF1BU0@chico.mail.uwo.ca> for ikhavki@uwo.ca;
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:38:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailman.ucar.edu (mailman.ucar.edu [192.52.106.6])
by kam.its.uwo.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2PIcYAZ006858 for
<ikhavki@uwo.ca>; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:38:35 -0500
Received: from mailman.ucar.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailman.ucar.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j2PIcXKE005792 for
<ikhavki@uwo.ca>; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:38:33 -0700
Received: (from mail@localhost) by mailman.ucar.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit)
id j2PIcX4b005790 for ikhavki@uwo.ca; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:38:33 -0700
Received: from mscan4.ucar.edu (mscan4.ucar.edu [128.117.64.126])
by mailman.ucar.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j2PIcXKE005786 for
<physics-research@mailman.ucar.edu>; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:38:33 -0700
Received: by mscan4.ucar.edu (Postfix) id 3B3CC7802F; Fri,
25 Mar 2005 11:38:33 -0700 (MST)
Received: from localhost (mscan4 [127.0.0.1]) by mscan4.ucar.edu (Postfix)
with ESMTP id EED647802E for <physics-research@ucar.edu>; Fri,
25 Mar 2005 11:38:32 -0700 (MST)
Received: from mscan4.ucar.edu ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mscan4.ucar.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 29190-01 for <physics-research@ucar.edu>; Fri,
25 Mar 2005 11:38:32 -0700 (MST)
Received: from chx400.switch.ch (chx400.switch.ch [130.59.10.2])
by mscan4.ucar.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAC778029 for
<physics-research@ncar.ucar.edu>; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:38:32 -0700 (MST)
Received: from proxy.google.com ([216.239.37.5]) by chx400.switch.ch with esmtp
(Exim 3.20 #1)
id 1DEthW-00009c-00 for sci-physics-research@moderators.isc.org; Fri,
25 Mar 2005 19:38:30 +0100
Received: from G018037 by proxy.google.com with ESMTP id j2PIbnkb032521 for
<sci-physics-research@moderators.isc.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:37:49 -0800
Received: (from news@localhost) by Google Production with id j2PIbnRA017302
for sci-physics-research@moderators.isc.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:37:49 -0800
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1111775868 17296 127.0.0.1
(25 Mar 2005 18:37:48 GMT)
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:37:44 -0800
From: Sci~Girl <palmtree117@juno.com>
Subject: Re: Learning quantum mechanics at age 14
In-reply-to: <423B2EF0.6090609@univie.ac.at>
To: sci-physics-research@moderators.isc.org
Message-id: <1111775864.398301.250120@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
Organization: http://groups.google.com
X-Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
NNTP-posting-date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:37:48 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-to: physics-research@ucar.edu
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.19.212.108;
posting-account=jTjZRg0AAAAICd9ZHfEZJmXJ9_bu1yfd
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ucar.edu
X-Spam-Score: -1.528 () BAYES_00,FORGED_JUNO_RCVD,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
Newsgroups: sci.physics.research
NNTP-posting-host: 70.19.212.108
References: <1109799989.427410.156750@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
<1111019108.240443.118670@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
<423B2EF0.6090609@univie.ac.at>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Content-Length: 517
Lines: 14
Arnold Neumaier wrote:
If you like math it is much less work than you might think,
and it is fun! Just start with next years textbook and read it
in your spare time! I started reading math beyond my age when I
was 12, and didn't regret it.
With the right motivation, you can learn 10 times as fast
as when you just wait till the subject comes up in school!
Yep that's how I learned physics, and how I'm learning German. Maybe
I'll try. I read the rest of this year's textbook, so I know linear
algebra... I think.
> It is often claimed that the cosmological constant is off by 120
> orders of magnitude (or 30 orders on a linear scale). The argument
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> effect is an unphysical approximation, which effectively amounts to
> setting alpha = infinity. Any thoughts?
The paper looks completely sound to me.
Jaffe presents his case without obvious fault and without
unjustified claims. The conclusion also fits my general picture
of qunatum field theory. So I see no reason not to trust it.
Arnold Neumaier