Natural Science Forum / Physics / Research / May 2005

I'm sorry, the correct link is:

http://usuarios.lycos.es/Rufianin/aboutschrodingere.pdf

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rafael Aparicio <aparicio.rafael@gmail.com>
Date: 24-may-2005 21:39
Subject: A new theory of Unification?
To: physics-research@ncar.ucar.edu

Dear Friends,

We now that's a problem when we work in Quantum Mechanics with
Relativity. It's like a paradoxal situation that one works only if the
influences of the other is not near of it.

Well, really not, because we have the Dirac's formulation, that
unifies both two. But we feel like something doesn't work, like
something was out of place.

Just adjoint an english translation of a chapter of my thesis, about
what I think that's the problem about QM an RT, using Fluid Mechanics.

http://usuarios.lycos.es/Rufianin/schrodingere.pdf

(Extract from "de la naturaleza de lo visible y lo invisible").

Critics are wellcome. What do you think about this?

It's the first step of a work.

R. Aparicio.

Pagina no encontrada.

Subject: Quantum Particles are Fluids.
THEOREM:
A particle satisfying the non-relativistic Schroedinger equation is
equivalently characterized as a fluid with the following properties
(1) It is irrotational
(2) It occupies all space
(3) It has finite total mass
(4) It satisfies the Continuity Equation
(5) It satisfies the Euler Equation
(6) It has a non-isotropic [stress tensor] satisfying the
   Equation of State:
          / h-bar \ 2  / (del rho) (del rho)               \
     P = |  -----  |  |  ------------------- - del^2 rho I  |
          \  2m   /    \         rho                       /
where
              P = the pressure dyad
              m = the total mass of the fluid
            rho = the mass density of the fluid
            del = the vector gradient operator
Dyadic notation was used above with
       I = the identity dyad
    u v = the linear operator which maps vector w |-> u (v.w)

Similar analyses can be carried out on the Pauli-Schroedinger equation
(resulting in a rotational fluid), as well as on the various
relativistic equations (Klein-Gordon, Dirac-Kemmer) at the
semi-classical level.

Note: the foregoing is only valid for *one particle* states.  The
"fluid" in general does NOT reside in ordinary space, but in
CONFIGURATION space, which is generally unrelated to ordinary space!
For two particles, the fluid lives in 6-dimensional space.

So, the equating of a quantum system with a fluid in ordinary space is
a midnomer in the general case.

Dear Rafael,

I cannot get either link to work.

Regards,
Ed Hanna

Even alone, QM doesn't work.  It is perhaps where we have to see in the
first time.