Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Research / September 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Zitterbewegung

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
DTebar@gmail.com - 19 Aug 2007 20:38 GMT
Can anyone please refer me to where I could find computer models --
their graphical output, of zitterbewegung?
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax - 01 Sep 2007 13:33 GMT
> Can anyone please refer me to where I could find computer models --
> their graphical output, of zitterbewegung?

Random walk in 3 dimensions?

Signature

Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
Remote Viewing classes in London

DRLunsford - 05 Sep 2007 13:02 GMT
On Sep 1, 8:33 am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> DTe...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Can anyone please refer me to where I could find computer models --
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> http://www.transcendence.me.uk/- Transcendence UK
> Remote Viewing classes in London

No.

-drl
Roland Franzius - 03 Sep 2007 15:08 GMT
DTebar@gmail.com schrieb:
> Can anyone please refer me to where I could find computer models --
> their graphical output, of zitterbewegung?

Which one you are interested in? Brownian Motion, atomic motion in
lattices or the classical (non existing) Zitterbewegung of the Dirac
Electron position operator?

Signature

Roland Franzius

DRLunsford - 05 Sep 2007 13:02 GMT
On Aug 19, 3:38 pm, DTe...@gmail.com wrote:
> Can anyone please refer me to where I could find computer models --
> their graphical output, of zitterbewegung?

There is nothing worth seeing. This is not an observable thing. These
pathologies are symptoms of incomplete theories, not something to gawk
at in pseudo-amazement. In any case what do you want to see? Particles
orbiting each other at the speed of light? Why do you bother trying to
"see" this, when the simplest understanding of relativity would allow
you to understand that massive things don't *go* at the speed of
light? You would be better off trying to understand what the Dirac
equation *means*, and trying to improve it if possible.

-drl
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.