> In the context of the solution of Schrodinger equation, is there any
> modified form of the WKB approximation which can be applied for the
> Schrodinger equation in cylindrical coordinates? More specifically, if
> the potential depends only on the radial distance i.e V=V(r), then one
> arrives at the radial equation after separation of variables; how can
> this equation be solved using the WKB method?
Yes. If you use separation of variables, to write the wave function in
terms of spherical coordinates psi(x) = R(r) Y_lm(theta,phi), where Y_lm
are the spherical harmonics, then you'll get a radial Schroedinger
equation for the radial wave function R(r). If you are in 2D, then you
can replace spherical coordinates with polar coordinates and replace
Y_lm by appropriate angular functions. Also, if you are in 3D and are
dealing with cylindrical symmetry, you can replace Y_lm by appropriate
functions of phi and z.
Use the substitution S(r) = r*R(r) and rewrite the radial Schroedinger
equation in terms of it. The kinetic term of this new equation will be
identical to the kinetic term of 1D linear motion. The potential term
will be a modified version of V(r). In this form the radial Schroedinger
equation is amenable to treatment by the WKB method.
More details in Sections 32 and 49 of Landau's book on Non-relativistic
Quantum Mechanics (Course on Theoretical Physics, vol.3).
Hope this helps.
Igor
Igor Khavkine - 28 Aug 2007 11:56 GMT
> Use the substitution S(r) = r*R(r) and rewrite the radial Schroedinger
> equation in terms of it. The kinetic term of this new equation will be
> identical to the kinetic term of 1D linear motion. The potential term
> will be a modified version of V(r). In this form the radial Schroedinger
> equation is amenable to treatment by the WKB method.
Eh, I kept thinking of a spherical coordinates as I wrote this. If you
use r to represent the distance from the z-axis, as in cylindrical or
polar coordinates, then the correct substitution is S(r) = sqrt(r)*R(r).
Igor