Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Research / February 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

On Snyder's paper on quantized space-time

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
arkobose - 30 Jan 2008 06:08 GMT
Hello,
I have been trying to work out the mathematical details of H Snyder's
1947 paper, titled Quantized Space-Time
(http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v71/i1/p38_1),
and I am stuck at something.

When the space-time variables are considered as Hermitian operators,
and we need to verify that they satisfy Lorentz invariance, I believe
we need the quantity speed in the Lorentz transformation equations. My
question is, in the context of Snyder's paper, how do we define speed?

Further, if speed is not required, then how do we prove the Lorentz
invariance of these operators?

Please do guide me on this, if you have an idea of what I am talking
about.

Thank you.
sr - 01 Feb 2008 18:31 GMT
> I have been trying to work out the mathematical details of H Snyder's
> 1947 paper, titled Quantized Space-Time
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Further, if speed is not required, then how do we prove the Lorentz
> invariance of these operators?

Lorentz transformations are defined by their property of preserving
the usual indefinite quadratic form, i.e: eqn(1) in Snyder's paper.

 S^2 = c^2 t^2 - x^2 - y^2 - z^2    (1)

In ordinary SR, we find that some of these transformations (the
boosts)
can be expressed in terms of velocity. But the fundamental property
is preservation of the above form (1).

Snyder takes exactly this approach. He considers a larger De Sitter
space with an extra "\eta_4" variable, and looks for transformations
which leave "\eta_4" invariant, as well as preserving his eqn(2)
(i.e., the quadratic form in De Sitter space).

HTH.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.