Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Research / February 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Category Theory and Physics

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
klw1026@gmail.com - 17 Feb 2008 09:54 GMT
I am currently working my way through classical Yang-Mills theory with
the help of John Baez's book on gauge fields and some others.  I have
recently just began to notice the new, well new to myself, research on
higher gauge theory.  This looks very interesting but I feel that my
background in category theory is too weak to actually understand
everything that is going on.  This seems to be a recurring theme as I
try to advance my knowledge of mathematical physics.  Last semester I
took a course on topological quantum field theory and another on
quantum groups and I feel that I did not get a lot out of it due to
the amount of category theory that was used.  So my question is this:
does anyone know of a good reference for learning category theory?  I
have looked at Mac Lane's book but find a bit "spooky" with the amount
of set theory he uses.  Thanks for the help.
Igor Khavkine - 19 Feb 2008 04:04 GMT
> I am currently working my way through classical Yang-Mills theory with
> the help of John Baez's book on gauge fields and some others.  I have
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> have looked at Mac Lane's book but find a bit "spooky" with the amount
> of set theory he uses.  Thanks for the help.

John himself is fond of talking about category theory and its relation
to physics. So, not a bad place to start would be his own website. See
for instance [1] and [2]. The notes from his website are often presented
in a very casual manner, so to get the most out of them you might want
to followup on his references while working through them.

[1] http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/categories.html
[2] http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/QG.html

Hope this helps.

Igor
Lou Pecora - 20 Feb 2008 09:37 GMT
> John himself is fond of talking about category theory and its relation
> to physics. So, not a bad place to start would be his own website. See
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Igor

I've just been lurking a little on this thread, but I looked at these
web pages and I would recommend them, too.  Very nice intro to
Categories.  And I started knowing nothing about categories.  The
explanation of the lack of a functor from classical systems to quantum
systems that would represent a quantization was enlightening since it
also showed a good example of functors and categories and the
application.

Signature

-- Lou Pecora

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.