Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Research / May 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

D=26 in bosonic string theory?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Calvin D. Ritchie - 28 May 2008 03:06 GMT
I'm just getting started on reading Polchinski, "String Theory", V 1,
and have run into something that leaves me totally lost. I've looked
at Polchinski's web site to see if there is, perhaps, a correction,
but found nothing pertinent. I have the 2005 printing of the book
which seems to include most of the corrections on Polchinski's
web-site.

On pg. 22, Eq. (1.3.34), Polchinski writes, essentially:

Sum(n=1, infty) n*Exp(-eps*n)=(1/eps^2) - (1/12) + Order(eps).

I've used eps= Polchinski's (epsilon*(Pi/(2p^+) *alpha'*l)^1/2, but
don't see how that can change anything essential. The r.h.s. of that
equation dumbfounds me. The sum on the l.h.s. can be written, exactly,
as

Sum(n=1, infty) n*Exp(eps*n)=[Exp(-eps)]/[1-Exp(-eps)]^2.

I don't see any approximation that leads to Polchinski's result,
particularly the 1/12 term, which is essential to his conclusion of
D=26. Moreover, if I approximate the sum by an integral, I get

Integral(n=1, infty){dn*n*Exp(-eps*n)}={(1/eps^2) +
(1/eps)}*Exp(-eps),

and I still can't see how that could possibly give Polchinski's
result. Note that a change in the lower limit of the sum or integral
from n=1 to n=0 doesn't change the sums, and only changes the integral
evaluation to -> (1/eps^2) as the only term.

Can anyone tell me what I'm missing or mis-interpreting?

Don Ritchie
Calvin D. Ritchie - 28 May 2008 03:06 GMT
Within an hour of sending off the question, I realized the answer.
Sorry to be so dense, but, just in case anyone else has trouble seeing
the correct approach:

Exp(-eps)/[1-Exp(-eps)]^2 =
Exp(-eps)/[1-2Exp(-eps)+Exp(-2eps)]=1/[Exp(+eps)-2+Eps(-eps)],

Now, taking the usual expansion of the exponentials in the
denominator, only even powers of eps survive, and

1/[Exp(+eps)-2+Eps(-eps)] ~ 1/[eps^2 + (eps^4)/12 + ......] ~
[1-(eps^2)/12]/{eps^2[1-(eps^4)/144 + ....] ~ 1/eps^2 - 1/12 + .......

Also, if anyone is interested, there's a better, IMO, presentation of
this development in Zwiebach's "A First Course in String Theory", pgs.
221 and Problem 12.4 on pg. 243.

Don Ritchie
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.