On Jul 27, 2:51 pm, "Green Xenon [Radium]" <glucege...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi:
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Radium
Because the signal energy the receiver captures is proportional to its
antenna size, and for a mobile receiver it is very difficult to make a
large enough antenna to be practical Other things being equal the
antenna size is roughly proportional to its wavelength. At 1kHz
carrier frequency the wavelength is 300km, at 1GHz it is 30cm. In the
70's the US Navy built a country-size antenna farm for ELF to link to
its strategic submarines because ELF can penetrate sea water. The
antenna that the submarine was towing was obviously tiny compared to
the transmitter's. The other issue is that the lower the frequency the
more atmospheric and other man-made external noises enter the receiver
along with the signal, thus there really is not much point ot building
large receiver antennas because the signal to noise ratio will be
dominated by how much you tranmsit and atmospheric noise, and their
ratio is independent of the receiver antenna size. Then the only thing
you can do is to increase the transmit power. But you still have to be
able to radiate it out, all of it, and that takes an antenna whose
scale is a reasonable fraction of the wavelength, hence these are
usually one-way links such as AM broadcast radio around 1MHz.
Above around 50MHz or so, internal receiver noise starts to dominate
and then the larger the receiver antenna the better the reception is,
above 300MHz most of the receiver noise is internally generated in the
first amplifier and in the following RF hardware.