Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / January 2007

    In IIBM-ese that's useally writte as
    [3,4] .* (apples equiv. organges) =>  3,4,5 Rightous Brothers
Triangle.

 All you proved is that you are perceptively blind to infinities, and that
just to begin with. Yes, I suppose to you it would look like "3 apples + 4
oranges."

 It seems that in no uncertain terms you told me above that velocity is in
the category of absolute. Whereas I am saying in no uncertain terms that it
is in the category of relative, excepting of course that c = c, 0 = 0 . . .
AND the middling space-per-time [in all four blocks] is both + and -
150,000kps. Which c, 0, and 150,000kps (v), are apples? And which c, 0, and
150,000kps (v), are oranges?

 But of course (infinity)]0 and c[(1) certainly are not relative, though
150,000kps (v) is most certainly relative. Maybe that difference is what you
meant by apples and oranges.

---------------------

 ** I here and now admit to yet another appallingly huge screw up I've been
making over the last months. With the common relationship in use, "An
infinitesimal relatively indistinguishable from zero (0)," I've been
relating 'infinite' to '1', as in, "Infinite relatively indistinguishable
from one (1)," therefore opposing infinite to infinitesimal....when in fact,
I see now, both infinite and infinitesimal are relatively indistinguishable
from zero (0). To mean: 0-dimensional. Each resides in the other, is both
internal and external to the other, and, in their cases, ultimately cancel
each other out to '0'[(infinity), leaving '1', some universal --  
cosmological -- 'constant'. Constants that are neither finite nor (infinite
/ infinitesimal), since they will always equal 'Unity' and '1' in any case
whatsoever (G = c = h-bar = k = ? = Unity = 1). But then '1' always stares
into the Abyss that always stares right back at it, '0'[(infinity). Thus the
fundamental Base is not '1' but '2'. In another context, something like,
"Big Brother / Sister state, meet God!" 'Finite' is relative (or "relative
to...."): "having bounds or limits; not too great or too small to be
measurable...subject to limitations or conditions, as of space, time,
circumstances, or the laws of nature: [man's finite existence on earth]"
(or, some people's quite finite- (quite limited-) mindedness ("mental
pygmy"-mindedness), etc.). **

---------------------

. . . <= -0|0+ =>  <= -1|+1 =>  <= -0|0+ =>  <= -1|+1 =>. . .

. . . <= +1|-1 =>  <= +0|0- =>  <= +1|-1 =>  <= +0|0- =>. . .

. . . <= -0|0+ =>  <= -1|+1 => . . .

. . . <= +1|-1 =>  <= +0|0- => . . .

<> <> <>

James Garner (looking at bullet dented sheriff's badge): "This badge must
have saved a man's life."

Harry Morgan: "It would have if it hadn't been for all those other bullets
flying in from everywhere!"

-- Support Your Local Sheriff

------------------------

GLB