 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / April 2007Public Service Announcement
Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth. Please drop your pants, bend slightly at the waist, and gripping your left foot behind your back just go ahead and kick yourself right in the a.s on behalf of myself. Repeat this 3 times while hopping on the right foot and spinning counterclockwise as viewed from above. http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/ On Apr 28, 10:51 pm, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth. > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/ I'd like to point out figure (k) which has a certain relevance for further expansion. Imagine that you have to deliver information within the "rod". The wave occupies whole rod or one middle. Then it occupies one half or the quarter at the center. As it searches for it's own definition of that region it is folded into halves. So nonlocality is like realizing that all reality exists inside of an antenna, and yet another one folded. It is unknowable where antenna is. > On Apr 28, 10:51 pm, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > like realizing that all reality exists inside of an antenna, and yet > another one folded. It is unknowable where antenna is. I can smell a setup a mile away. You're good, but my string theory meter is going nuts right about now. Image (k) represent length where the quantization if fixed. The graduations are stationary. This contrasts with image (f) where the placement of graduations is indeterminate. [1] When length is acting like image (e) we can write this as ( a + ~b ). [2] When length is acting like image (f) we can write this as (a)*( ~b). There are who possible ways to charaterize waves in this scheme. In situation [1] the green (sub-Plancklength and trivial) region moves around discretely, basically a cellular automata-like wave. In situation [2] you simply allow probability densities to slosh around, and the notion of scale would really help here I think. Lastly, situation [1] and [2] are basically two different aspects of the same thing due to topological indeterminacy. Space is indeterminately either continuous or discrete. > > On Apr 28, 10:51 pm, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > I can smell a setup a mile away. You're good, but my string theory meter is > going nuts right about now. Yeah catch my string if you can ;-) > Image (k) represent length where the quantization if fixed. The graduations > are stationary. This contrasts with image (f) where the placement of > graduations is indeterminate. > > [1] When length is acting like image (e) we can write this as ( a + ~b ). > [2] When length is acting like image (f) we can write this as (a)*( ~b). But you se (e) and (f) contain the same coding sequence! > There are who possible ways to charaterize waves in this scheme. > > In situation [1] the green (sub-Plancklength and trivial) region moves > around discretely, basically a cellular automata-like wave. It appears that way, but all extensions, all elongations, all holes, even some gyrochronological period is one single wave form don't you think? > In situation [2] you simply allow probability densities to slosh around, and > the notion of scale would really help here I think. > > Lastly, situation [1] and [2] are basically two different aspects of the > same thing due to topological indeterminacy. Space is indeterminately either > continuous or discrete. Space is mystery. :-)) > > > On Apr 28, 10:51 pm, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> > > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > even some gyrochronological period is one single wave form don't you > think? gyrochronological ? Is that something like an OBGYN ? > > In situation [2] you simply allow probability densities to slosh around, and > > the notion of scale would really help here I think. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Space is mystery. :-)) > > > "boson boss" <junker...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > > Is that something like an OBGYN ? Probably. Its a history of rotation of an object and I think its unhealthy :-)) > > > In situation [2] you simply allow probability densities to slosh around, > and [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > > Space is mystery. :-)) > > > Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth. > > > [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > same thing due to topological indeterminacy. Space is indeterminately either > continuous or discrete. You can easily craft some arguments based on this approach which address everything in QED. Partial reflection of light by a surface of glass, diffraction gradients, bla bla bla. In fact, this approach sheds light on "why" you have partial reflection of light on the surface of glass in the first place, I suspect that absorption reflectance and transmittance is rather quite a bit like the Huygens-Fresnel model, the usual wave explanation which explains pinhole diffraction. > > > > Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth. > [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > rather quite a bit like the Huygens-Fresnel model, the usual wave > explanation which explains pinhole diffraction. I dunno if the waves can go through phase change of medium or something like that. The push pull philosophy for waves across glass navigates into zone of free discharge in the empty space. > > > > > Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth. > > [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > something like that. The push pull philosophy for waves across glass > navigates into zone of free discharge in the empty space. I get the feeling that folks have been thinking about this exact approach that I am pursuing. That people have been toying with it for many years, but have not been able to make it work. That nonexistence makes no sense, and nobody ever got past that point. But I am very curious, because allowing existence to be indeterminate does not seem like such a huge leap. But making the connection to order, disorder, randomness, bla bla bla, ........now that is quite a stretch, ....and allowing space to flip flop back and forth from discrete to continuous freely ? I think that most people would probably scoff at that - initially anyway. Until it is shown that it might make sense algebraically. Woo-wee |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.