Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / May 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

High gamma energy source

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jaga@klaehn.myrf.net - 17 May 2007 06:46 GMT
I am trying to set up the experiment with the high energy gamma source
which would be able to produce positrons in the material by use of the
pair creation. I need to have a relatively high gamma energy for it.
Are there any natural high energy gamma sources which have a half-life
of at least days or weeks?

I found only some short-lived sources in some of the natural decay
series. They decay fast but at least they have longer lived parent
isotopes. The only radioisotope with a relatively high energy and T1/2
which I found is Bi-208 E (gamma) = 2.614 MeV.

Any other candidates?

By the way, is there anyway the active nuclear physics discussion
forum?

Jagoda
H. Wabnig - 17 May 2007 08:45 GMT
>I am trying to set up the experiment with the high energy gamma source
>which would be able to produce positrons in the material by use of the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Jagoda

For the isotope question you may want to join

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CDV700CLUB/

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/GeigerCounterEnthusiasts/

w.
hhc314@yahoo.com - 18 May 2007 03:13 GMT
No, for what you seem to want, I really don't see you finding any
natural sources.

The isotopes that are employed for x-rays of welding joints, etc., are
manufactured using reactors, are heavily controlled, and are very
dangerous to employ. None are of natural origin.

Harry C.

On May 17, 1:46 am, j...@klaehn.myrf.net wrote:
> I am trying to set up the experiment with the high energy gamma source
> which would be able to produce positrons in the material by use of the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Jagoda
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu - 19 May 2007 08:54 GMT
>I am trying to set up the experiment with the high energy gamma source
>which would be able to produce positrons in the material by use of the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Any other candidates?

For obvious reasons, any naturally occuring sources with half lives of
days/weeks (in fact with any half life short on geological scale) must
be interim elements in decay chains originating with elements with
half lives comparable or longer than geological time scales.  You'll
find few of these in the Uranium and Thorium decay chains.

Mati Meron                      | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu         |  chances are he is doing just the same"
Jaga - 30 May 2007 05:09 GMT
Guys,

thanks for your help. I think, I was wrong with the idea of producing
pairs from high energy gamma source. This is not really what I wanted
to have as a high energy positron source. Yes, gamma will produce
pairs but their production would be instantenous, there will be no any
activation there and what I really wanted is to have activated probe.

I found two other ways to do it - by a so called generator source
which consist of long lifetime EC source which then decays to a high
energy positron source which decays very fast. Another way is to use
high energy alpha in (alpha,n) or (alpha, gamma) reaction. But the
cross-section for such a reaction may be pretty low.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.