> A paper entitled "The Structure of Atom as interpreted by Model Mechanics"
> is available in the following website:http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
>
> Ken Seto
Who cares?
> A paper entitled "The Structure of Atom as interpreted by Model Mechanics"
> is available in the following website:
> http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
>
> Ken Seto
Ken, this is the same old sh.t, and it is wrong--not in agreement
with the results of observation and experiment. For example,
consider two entities, A and B, experiencing relative motion
such that each measures dv/dt = 0 and c > |dr/dt| >> 0 with respect
to each other.
Consider observer A. A will *measure* B's clock to run slow.
Similarly, B will *measure* A's clock to run slow. And, of course,
this is expected due to the symmetric relationship between A and B.
The degree of *measured* time dilation is exactly as is predicted
by Einstein's special relativity.
Now let's put some numbers to this. Let |dr/dt| equal 10000.0 km/s.
Then A will measure B's clock to run slow by a factor of 1.00056,
and B will *measure* A's clock to run slow by a factor of 1.00056.
Each measures the other's clock to run slower than her own.
Furthermore, Ken, time dilation can come from relative velocity *and*
from gravitation. Sometime we have to deal with both.
> A paper entitled "The Structure of Atom as interpreted by Model Mechanics"
> is available in the following website:
Have it printed on soft paper, perforated and spooled onto cardboard
tubes, then send me a case.