 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / August 2007photons, phonons and perceptual frequencies
Hi! I've been doing some reading on visual perception and complied a graph of frequencies & found some pretty decent sines along the way. I was looking into wave energy of percieved sound and sight, along the lines of Erv Wilsons mathematical mapping (et al) What I wanted to know was, where or if my compiled graph of sine wave data significantly crossed any of the standard measured wavelength activity of photons, where and how. I was also messing around with an old math book trying to figure out how to calculate pi without a calculator and stumbled upon a handy sequence of numerals. Just out-of-the-hat, as ever more digits are found in pi, is there any similar or notable expansion of the 360 degrees of a circle? tia :) n > Hi! > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > n You might want to ask of exactly when does a photon become a graviton, and/or of when does a graviton become a photon. Either way you'll get lots of flak because you're not supposed to be smart enough to ask such questions, much less capable of understanding or otherwise appreciating whatever's the truth. - Brad Guth > > Hi! > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Thanks, Gravitons, hmm... newbie on that subject!! A graviton is a magnetic field that hangs onto stuff long enough for time to be measured by the decay of bond? Perhaps an 'absolute' photon is a free wave of particles (as measured during the period they/it were held in a magnetic field?) So an absolute - absolute photon would be fairly, hmm, well difficult to spot if it wern't for its tenuousness or tenacity?, Hmm? not doing very well am !! :( a photon is also an absolute measurement to some. Can the existance of an absolute photon be proved? I was interested to read about the spin, I hav'nt calculated mass yet...but I suppose rotation and the scattering of bits and pieces of/by sub atomic detritus will give me an opportunity to transcribe untold joys through sines presently :) n > > > Hi! > [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > > n Hi n, My maths and physics textbooks have just never seemed to lend themselves to poetic reinterpretation (McGraw-Hill, you know). Where are you getting yours? -- Joe > > > > Hi! > [quoted text clipped - 65 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Hang on a mo....I'll go have a look at the papyrus > > > > > Hi! > [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] > > - Show quoted text - this was published in 1977 tho > > > Hi! > [quoted text clipped - 56 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I'm not exactly sure what an "absolute photon" is. Is it still 2D quantum string like? ??? gravitons could certainly formulate into representing a magnetic force, although perhaps they are just the smallest form of a photon, way shorter than any hard gamma, and of there being lots of them little suckers, including enough in sheer numbers in order to fully and safely surround a black hole's core of antimatter. - Brad Guth > > > > Hi! > [quoted text clipped - 68 lines] > > - Show quoted text - >I'm not exactly sure what an "absolute photon" is. Is it still 2D >quantum string like? I take one to describe light in motion, the other to be a description of its components or activity as stationary. All together, I'm thinking they work like a line of cogs, so if you grate the gears you get particles spinning off. Thats 2D, so mass spin to me is a little bit complicated as yet :/ >??? gravitons could certainly formulate into representing a magnetic >force, although perhaps they are just the smallest form of a photon, >way shorter than any hard gamma, and of there being lots of them >little suckers, including enough in sheer numbers in order to fully >and safely surround a black hole's core of antimatter. I'm using stats of workaday visual spectrum of white light, and until now it hadnt occurred to me that mass could be relative to wavelength frequency, is that so? I imagined black holes to be hot and dense, although I also take it condensed cooled matter is generally less active. Anyway, why do Physicists use colour terms when the electromagnetic spectrum is way way bigger than might be accommodated by the visual system? Visually...theres a low peak and plateau as the blue fades to black, as far as I'm aware this is to do with physiology alone, although it is loosely correspondent with red at the other end of the spectrum. My sines cross briefly but unexpectedly at that point. Anyway, time to make my breakfast! Thanks :) n Hi! I've been doing some reading on visual perception and complied a graph of frequencies & found some pretty decent sines along the way. I was looking into wave energy of percieved sound and sight, along the lines of Erv Wilsons mathematical mapping (et al) What I wanted to know was, where or if my compiled graph of sine wave data significantly crossed any of the standard measured wavelength activity of photons, where and how. I was also messing around with an old math book trying to figure out how to calculate pi without a calculator and stumbled upon a handy sequence of numerals. Just out-of-the-hat, as ever more digits are found in pi, is there any similar or notable expansion of the 360 degrees of a circle? tia :) n ************************************ No expansion of the 360 degrees of a circle with higher accuracies of PI. What the higher accuracy does for you is to let you calculate a more accurate circumference when given the diameter. I think I know who you are, based on your interest in colour and screenname. I hope you are doing well. We all do what we can imbedded in this gas of human molecules. > Hi! > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > n ------------------ there are some known experts for your quaton they are callsed the Superdarters !! as far as i collected them untill now theit names are an anomymous person who calles himself (rightly so ) Jekyle Randy Poe PD (Paul Daraper) another anomymous 'All in Datas ' Bjeoren Feuerbacher and sorry some others that i forgot anyway that if they like we can add them tothe list anyone of them can explain to you waht is the SUPERFART! all of them are experts of mathematics and they are convinced as you that mathematics should be the leader of physics and you can get some experimental data and EXTRAPOLATE IT A AS MUCH AS YOU LIKE and as far as mathematics can allow you 2 honesy in physics does not count as long as it i sagainst your private bussiness and in order of being a goos physicsit it is enough to be a good personal politician or a smarty lawyer talented born Good luck Y.Porat ------------------------- Did you ever buy that house in Liverpool? > Did you ever buy that house in Liverpool? Did you ever get a grip of her in that barn? > > Did you ever buy that house in Liverpool? > > Did you ever get a grip of her in that barn? More than a grip. Hope you found someone in the real world. You deserve that, you really do, not just electrons on a screen. I'll leave you alone from now on. > Did you ever buy that house in Liverpool? --------------------- you dont need a house you can use the internet so go to your above friends (that probably belong to your clan) and ask them about thier SUPERFART !! (a photon with a frequancy of--- one cycle per 100 billion yers) you can ask your Josef Goebeless as well about it .... Y.Porat ------------------------- |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.