As well as a hadron is divided into quarks, is a lepton divisible into
more fundamental particles? Based on that idea, I tried to introduce a
composite model of lepton in the following site;
http://hecoaustralia.fortunecity.com/lepton/lepton.htm
Igor - 30 Oct 2007 18:46 GMT
On Oct 28, 8:55 pm, square17320...@gmail.com wrote:
> As well as a hadron is divided into quarks, is a lepton divisible into
> more fundamental particles? Based on that idea, I tried to introduce a
> composite model of lepton in the following site;http://hecoaustralia.fortunecity.com/lepton/lepton.htm
This was already done a few decades ago, Look up "preons" and
"technicolor".
Rock Brentwood - 30 Oct 2007 22:45 GMT
On Oct 28, 7:55 pm, square17320...@gmail.com wrote:
> As well as a hadron is divided into quarks, is a lepton divisible into
> more fundamental particles? Based on that idea, I tried to introduce a
> composite model of lepton in the following site;http://hecoaustralia.fortunecity.com/lepton/lepton.htm
A bigger picture puts everything into a more interesting (and
revealing) perspective, cutting across the categorization you're
attempting to impose.
The Fermion Cube
illustrated under:
http://federation.g3z.com/Physics/index.htm#StandardModel
As you can see, a composite model is more likely to be one that throws
both leptons and quarks into the same mix, as vividly seen by the
(2x2x2) x (2x2)x3 classifications depicted.