From Osher Doctorow
D. H. Delphenich of Bethany College Lindsborg Kansas, who has 10
papers on arXiv, goes considerable way toward deriving Quantum Theory
from Electrostatics and analogous Coulomb Laws in other classical
branches of physics (by a generalizing process involving adding
"machinery" to the Electrostatics, etc.), in "Nonlinear
electrostatics: steps toward a neoclassical electron model," D. H.
Delphenich, arXiv: 0708.4194, physics.gen-ph/physics.class-ph, 16
pages.
He points out explicitly the need to generalize the methods to obtain
QCD, and although he doesn't explicitly define his theory/methods as a
theory of Quantum Gravity, my arguments in this Section and previous
Sections regarding Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation F = Gm1m2/r^2
seem to indicate that he is actually doing that in large part.
Instead of continuing with the paper cited, I'll let Readers read
through it on arXiv, and turn to replying to Reader "Bob" on a
previous posting, who has suddenly gone from a Graffiti Artist and
Troll to claiming that one of my previous postings incorrectly cited a
paper as representing phase change rather than order change
(apparently in an effort to counteract my characterization of him as a
Graffiti Artist and Troll, he discovered how to read parts of a cited
article, but of course misinterpreted them to agree with his hostility-
orientation).
Osher Doctorow
bob - 29 Nov 2007 01:17 GMT
> From Osher Doctorow
>
>.....goes considerable way toward deriving Quantum Theory
> from Electrostatics and analogous Coulomb Laws in other classical
> branches of physics (by a generalizing process involving adding
> "machinery" to the Electrostatics,
"machinery"........
"Electrostatics and analogous Coulomb Laws........"
"in other classical branches of physics........"
what a load of smurf doo doo.
(just add some "machinery" to your physics, and walaha.....)