Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / November 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Evig - 28 Nov 2007 14:48 GMT
"How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"

    The previous posting showed ("A Basic Look at the Aether") that the
classical Aether must exist because it endowed the volume of supposedly
"empty" space with observable properties. If space were not filled with
"something" it could not have any properties other than volume since "space"
is an abstract mathematical concept, it is not "real". If, however, we add
the concept of the Aether, the confusion associated with the Relativity
concepts vanishes.

    Starting with Newtonian physics, let us add the observationally proven
concept that light propagates through space (i.e.- the Aether) at a velocity
determined by the permeability and dielectric constant of space. Light, and
all electromagnetic radiation, is a transverse wave and as such cannot
propagate through a fluid. It was concluded Early on that the Aether must be
a solid. If we examine the propagation of light though the cosmos we observe
that there is no detectable chromatic dispersion. The lack of such
dispersion shows that the Aether is either a continuous solid (like jello)
or granular (like tapioca). To produce the observed lack of chromatic
dispersion, the maximum  possible size of granularity must be extremely
small even compared to the Planck Length (10^35 meters). In addition, to
produce the cosmologically observed gravitational and inertial effects, the
Aether must be extremely ridged. Since matter can move freely though the
Aether, matter cannot be a solid, but rather must be composed of standing
waves, as some current theories have suggested. (If, for example, a quark or
an electron consisted of a single cycle of electromagnetic radiation
refracted into a circular path, a charged particle would be produced which
could propagate through the solid Aether -
http://einsteinhoax.com/posting44.htm. and be observed as matter.

    A basic premise of the Relativity concepts is that the velocity of
light is the same IN all velocity and elevation reference frames. This idea
has falsely been interpreted to means that the velocity of light is the same
BETWEEN all reference frames. Once one recognizes the difference, the
mystery of Relativity vanishes and the subject is easily understood at the
intuitive level. This basic premise of Relativity is incorrectly stated, it
should read that matter controls its properties by measuring the LOCAL
velocity of light and adjusting them so as to make the LOCALLY observed
velocity of light as C. There is no requirement that the velocity of light
be equal to C in other reference frames.

    With this in mind, consider that the observer's reference frame is at
absolute rest (an arbitrary but legitimate choice). In a reference frame
which is moving with respect to the observer's frame, light has further to
travel to make a round trip. In the direction parallel to the velocity
vector, the travel distance is increased by 1/(1-V^2/C^2) and in the
transverse direction by (1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5. In order for the velocity of
light to be C, as observed in the moving reference frame, matter must
contract in the direction of the velocity vector in proportion to
(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5. and the duration of the ticks of a clock must become longer
in proportion to (1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5. (This conclusion was provided by
Fitzgerald and Larmor two years prior to the publication of Special
Relativity.) This conclusion makes all of the effects associated with
Special Relativity intuitively obvious if one is not too lazy to think them
true (only algebra is required).  It can be shown that when velocity is
increased, additional energy is added to any energy in the matter. It is
this storage of energy which we observe as kinetic energy. It is associated
with the so-called "fictitious" force of inertia and results from a REAL
push against the Aether.

    There is, in addition, a relativistic effect associated with the
proximity of energy. The proximity of energy causes the local permeability
of space to be reduced. This reduction in permeability reduces the ABSOLUTE
velocity of light and causes matter to contract. In this contraction, matter
sheds energy by releasing the energy of fall and, after the fall contains a
mass energy which, in absolute terms, has been reduced by that energy. The
effect is to cause matter to "push" against the Aether with a force which is
currently (and falsely) interpreted as the "fictitious" force of gravity.

    All of the relativistic effects (velocity and gravity) can be defined
by three sets of transformations (transformations for other terms are found
by applying Dimensional Analysis to accepted physical laws).

Force =   1
Length =   (1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5)/(1-$)
Time =  ((1-V^2/C^2)^0.5)*(1-$)

Where $ is the gravitational potential between elevations as measured in
terms of the upper elevation units of measurement. It was very satisfying to
find that these transformations lead to predictions of the cosmologically
observed universe.

    The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm 
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

    All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

    Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

    E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.

    The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.
Uncle Al - 28 Nov 2007 19:27 GMT
> "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
[snip 100 lines of crap]

http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
No aether to one part in 10^16 sensitivity

Two simultaneous interferometers over a year's observation: Optical in
Berlin, Germany at 52°31'N 13°20'E and microwave in Perth, Australia
at 31°53'S 115°53E. An aether background, dichroic or otherwise, could
never be at rest relative to both of them.

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
<http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf>  
No aether

>      E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com

Idiot.

<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2001-4/index.html>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
<http://www.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~dkoks/Faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html>
Experimental constraints on General Relativity

Signature

Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Androcles - 28 Nov 2007 19:35 GMT
Open sewer with Schwartztord floating (River of sh.t) snipped.

 http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg
The pencil is broken. Don't like empirical observations, Schwartzshit?
Fuckhead.

Catch 22:
 http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif
 http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img76.gif

"BTW, you f.ck-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper, nor
could it.   Hey Schwartzshit, you are an ineducable idiot.  Your high
school should be leveled and replaced by an abandoned bowling alley."

 http://tinyurl.com/3pwu
Uncle Al - 28 Nov 2007 20:43 GMT
> Open sewer with Schwartztord floating (River of sh.t) snipped.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>   http://tinyurl.com/3pwu

http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
No aether to one part in 10^16 sensitivity

Two simultaneous interferometers over a year's observation: Optical in
Berlin, Germany at 52°31'N 13°20'E and microwave in Perth, Australia
at 31°53'S 115°53E. An aether background, dichroic or otherwise, could
never be at rest relative to both of them.

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
<http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf>  
No aether

>      E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com

Idiot.

<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2001-4/index.html>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
<http://www.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~dkoks/Faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html>
Experimental constraints on General Relativity
Signature

Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Androcles - 28 Nov 2007 22:02 GMT
: http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
: No aether to one part in 10^16 sensitivity

Agreed, so why bring it up?

"BTW, you f.ck-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper, nor
could it.   Hey Schwartzshit, you are an ineducable idiot.  Your high
school should be leveled and replaced by an abandoned bowling alley."

Schwartzshit has no brain to one part in 10^100 sensitivity.
Uncle Al - 28 Nov 2007 23:57 GMT
> : http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
> : No aether to one part in 10^16 sensitivity
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Schwartzshit has no brain to one part in 10^100 sensitivity.

http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
No aether to one part in 10^16 sensitivity

Two simultaneous interferometers over a year's observation: Optical in
Berlin, Germany at 52°31'N 13°20'E and microwave in Perth, Australia
at 31°53'S 115°53E. An aether background, dichroic or otherwise, could
never be at rest relative to both of them.

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
<http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf>  
No aether

Signature

Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Androcles - 29 Nov 2007 00:06 GMT
: > : http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
: > : No aether to one part in 10^16 sensitivity
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
: http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
: No aether to one part in 10^16 sensitivity

No aether, fuckhead.
No brain to one part in 10^100 sensitivity.

Snip rest of river of sh.t.
Florian - 28 Nov 2007 23:01 GMT
> > Open sewer with Schwartztord floating (River of sh.t) snipped.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> <http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf>  
>  No aether

I wonder why those people continue to waste their time on such useless
experiments? M&M experiment proved that if there is an aether, it is
dynamic not static.

Signature

Florian
"Toute vérité passe par trois phases. D'abord, elle est ridiculisée;
ensuite, elle rencontre une vive opposition avant d'être acceptée comme
une totale évidence" - Arthur Schopenhauer

Androcles - 28 Nov 2007 23:30 GMT
: > > Open sewer with Schwartztord floating (River of sh.t) snipped.
: > >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
: > >
: > > Catch 22:

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img76.gif

: > > "BTW, you f.ck-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper, nor
: > > could it.   Hey Schwartzshit, you are an ineducable idiot.  Your high
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
: experiments? M&M experiment proved that if there is an aether, it is
: dynamic not static.

Because they have their heads up their arses, just like Uncle Schwartzshit.
The same idiocy plugs away with Einstein's crap, it is only Newtonian
Mechanics that makes any fuckin' sense.  Sagnac "proved" the vector
addition of velocities, although it is an axiom and needs no proof.
The moron Schwartzshit hallucinates anyone that speaks out against
Einstein must be an aetherialist and that show what an idiot Schwartzshit
really is.
Uncle Al - 29 Nov 2007 00:00 GMT
> > > Open sewer with Schwartztord floating (River of sh.t) snipped.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> experiments? M&M experiment proved that if there is an aether, it is
> dynamic not static.

That doesn't work either.  When you trim off all the observable
anomalies you are left with absolutely nothing to 15 decimal places.
A vacuum scalar or pseudoscalar background would not be directional -
but it wouldn't be aether, either.

Signature

Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Androcles - 29 Nov 2007 00:06 GMT
No aether, fuckhead.
No brain to one part in 10^100 sensitivity.

Snip rest of river of sh.t.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.