Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / December 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Infinity + Action at a Distance=MW

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rushtown - 29 Dec 2007 21:17 GMT
If there are an infinite number of universes there must be at least
one that differs from this universe by only one electron. (at the
moment).

Further there also must be universes that differ from this one by only
one electron and where all the other particles were once entangled
with particles in this universe. (Assuming here an infinite past
time).

Therefore when I choose to observe this one (above mentioned) electron
in this universe in a certain way, I collapse the wave function in
another universe causing a branching alternative universe (or
reality).

So it seems that Everett's "many worlds" theory is proven by using
only a few simple and non controversial premises based on infinity and
quantum physics.
Don Stockbauer - 29 Dec 2007 22:46 GMT
> If there are an infinite number of universes there must be at least
> one that differs from this universe by only one electron. (at the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> only a few simple and non controversial premises based on infinity and
> quantum physics.

Unless there is only one Universe, and we can only view it out to the
causal horizon.

The micro and macroscopic don't mix well.
Sam Wormley - 30 Dec 2007 02:08 GMT
> If there are an infinite number of universes there must be at least
> one that differs from this universe by only one electron.

  Says who? What is measurable?
Rushtown - 30 Dec 2007 03:08 GMT
> > If there are an infinite number of universes there must be at least
> > one that differs from this universe by only one electron.
>
> � �Says who? What is measurable?

If
Sam Wormley - 30 Dec 2007 03:28 GMT
>> Says who? What is measurable?
>
> If

  Science is about what can be observed... measured...
Uncle Al - 31 Dec 2007 02:05 GMT
[snip crap]

Hey stooopid,

Infinity + Action at a Distance=MW

is bullshit.  Everybody knows

MW = melting point

Look up benzoic acid.

Signature

Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Rushtown - 31 Dec 2007 05:21 GMT
> [snip crap]
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> �(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

This reply typifies what I have said about you Uncle Al---you just
regurgitate the standard book learning and don't even do original
witty put downs.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.