I want to thank everyone who replied to my "bowling ball" post. On
that same freshman exam was this problem: a marble sits atop a larger
sphere of radius r. The marble starts falling off and when it loses
contact with the sphere, it has fallen a vertical distance h. The
question is: what proportion of r is h?
An illustration is at http://home.ca.inter.net/~deniswb/marbleproblem.jpg
(I don't know how or even if you can insert pictures into a usenet
post)
Again I did not get the final answer but got part marks for saying
that the acceleration due to gravity was slowed by a factor of cosine
theta. When the professor took it up the answer was h = r / 3
Thanks for all your help on these. It's been fascinating.
Denny
> I want to thank everyone who replied to my "bowling ball" post. On
> that same freshman exam was this problem: a marble sits atop a larger
> sphere of radius r. The marble starts falling off and when it loses
> contact with the sphere, it has fallen a vertical distance h. The
> question is: what proportion of r is h?
I can't believe I remember this, but as I recall the angle at which
the marble would fall off the sphere is 57.3 degrees - assuming I'm
remembering correctly. You can work out the proportion from there.
I don't know how a freshman's knowledge would be used to solve this
problem since this is a classic Lagrangian constraints problem.
> An illustration is athttp://home.ca.inter.net/~deniswb/marbleproblem.jpg
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Denny
Army1987 - 30 Jan 2008 21:36 GMT
>> I want to thank everyone who replied to my "bowling ball" post. On
>> that same freshman exam was this problem: a marble sits atop a larger
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I don't know how a freshman's knowledge would be used to solve this
> problem since this is a classic Lagrangian constraints problem.
The marble detaches from the sphere after the force exerted by the sphere
on the marble becomes zero. That force can be expressed as mass of the
marble times its acceleration minus the gravitational field. IIRC, h is
r/3.

Signature
Army1987 (Replace "NOSPAM" with "email")
Randy Poe - 30 Jan 2008 21:41 GMT
> > I want to thank everyone who replied to my "bowling ball" post. On
> > that same freshman exam was this problem: a marble sits atop a larger
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I don't know how a freshman's knowledge would be used to solve this
> problem since this is a classic Lagrangian constraints problem.
It's a Halliday & Resnick problem which can be solved
through energy and centripetal force considerations. I
suspect the bowling ball problem was from a similar
text.
- Randy
Denny - 30 Jan 2008 22:07 GMT
> > > I want to thank everyone who replied to my "bowling ball" post. On
> > > that same freshman exam was this problem: a marble sits atop a larger
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> - Randy
The professor was Donald G. Ivey (1922 - ) at University of Toronto.
He and Patterson Hume wrote several physics textbooks in the 1960s as
well as producing films and TV show (incl. The Nature of Things).
Denny - 30 Jan 2008 22:04 GMT
> > I want to thank everyone who replied to my "bowling ball" post. On
> > that same freshman exam was this problem: a marble sits atop a larger
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
It was a very tough course and part of a program called Engineering
Science at University of Toronto. It was a cut above other Engineering
Courses (Electrical, Chemical, Civil etc.) and designed to separate
the wheat from the chaff. I did not get high enough grades to continue
in Engineering Science and had to transfer to what the professor
called "garden variety" engineering.