Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / January 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Einstein : a small error of calculation...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Valeri Astanoff - 31 Jan 2008 11:54 GMT
Einstein : a small error of calculation...

In a communication on the quantum theory of monoatomic
ideal gases made in 1924 to the academy of sciences of Prussia:

Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaft
(1924, SB Phys.-math., S. 261-267)
Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases

Einstein uses this approximate formula:

z(y) = y - 0.1768*y^2 - 0.0034*y^3 - 0.0005*y^4

in order to eliminate 'x' from the system:

y = sum(x^k/k^(3/2), {k, 1, oo})
z = sum(x^k/k^(5/2), {k, 1, oo})

This approximate formula turns out to be mistaken,
the coefficient of y^4 being five times too large.

The approximate formula correctly calculated
(with computer and "mathematica") is indeed this one:

zc(y) = y - 0.1768*y^2 - 0.0033*y^3 - 0.0001177*y^4

Checking can be done with z(zeta(3/2)), which must
theoretically output zeta(5/2) = 1.34149 :

z(zeta(3/2)) - > 1.3219

compare to:

zc(zeta(3/2)) - > 1.34149

Anyone can be mistaken, even the great Einstein...

V.Astanoff

p.s. a colleague of mine makes me observe that, in 1924,
it was rather difficult to use a computer!
Don Stockbauer - 31 Jan 2008 12:50 GMT
> Einstein : a small error of calculation...
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> p.s. a colleague of mine makes me observe that, in 1924,
> it was rather difficult to use a computer!

God, it would be terrible to have all of one's output to be
conveniently put out for eternal review by all of future humanity.  If
this situation ever arises, one had better be perfect in all they
write, nicht war?

- Tex
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.