Moa Adagodu and Doron Zeilberger of respectively Virginia Commonwealth
University Richmond Virginia USA and Rutgers University New Jersey
USA, in "Searching for strange hypergeometric identities by sheer
brute force," 6 pages, arXiv: 0802.3832 v1 [math.CO] 26 Feb 2008,
obtain an arguably interesting but "strange" theorem by what they call
"brute force". However, simply searching for an equation of a related
type involving Probable Causation/Influence (PI) would give the same
result. The Theorem is, with (z)_k of their notation abbreviated to
(z)k here defined by:
1) (z)k = z(z + 1)(z + 2)...(z + k - 1), k positive integer
and with the Classical Hypergeometric Series defined by:
2) F(a, b, c, x) = sum (a)k (b)k x^k /[k! (c)k]
where sum is for k = 0 to infinity, given by:
Theorem 1. For all nonnegative integers r:
3) F(-2n, b, -2n + 2r - b, -1) = (A/B) C
where:
4) A = (1/2)n (b + 1 - r)n
5) B = (b/2 + 1 - r)n (b/2 + 1/2 - r)n
6) C = sum (D/E)G
7) D = 2^(2i) i! C(r + i - 1, 2i)
8) E = (b - r + 1)i
9) G = C(n, i)
where C(u, v) = u!/[(u - v)!v!], u > = v
and C(u, v) isn't related to the C of (6).
Notice that Probable Causation/Influence (PI) P(A-->B) is defined by:
10) P(A-->B) = 1 + y - x, y = P(AB), x = P(A)
or alternatively a second version is:
11) P ' (A-->B) = 1 + y - x, y = P(B), x = P(A), y < = x
were y < = x also in (10) automatically because P(AB) < = P(A) from
probability theory.
Looking at E of (8), it is just 1 + y - x with y = b, r = x, inside
the parentheses and i (a subscript) outside. So we can write up to a
constant of normalization:
12) E = (1 + y - x)i, y = b, x = r
Similarly for relevant factors of A and B of (4) and (5) respectively.
So a search for the appropriate PI equations would have yielded
Theorem 1 up to normalization constants except for the very common
C(u, v) in combinatorics and a few other factors.
Osher Doctorow
Al Lergy - 27 Feb 2008 14:52 GMT
> Moa Adagodu and Doron Zeilberger of respectively Virginia Commonwealth
> University Richmond Virginia USA and Rutgers University New Jersey
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> 1) (z)k = z(z + 1)(z + 2)...(z + k - 1), k positive integer
trivial
> and with the Classical Hypergeometric Series defined by:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> 8) E = (b - r + 1)i
> 9) G = C(n, i)
too many mistake here
> where C(u, v) = u!/[(u - v)!v!], u > = v
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> 10) P(A-->B) = 1 + y - x, y = P(AB), x = P(A)
That cannot apply, deleted.
doug - 27 Feb 2008 16:34 GMT
>> Moa Adagodu and Doron Zeilberger of respectively Virginia Commonwealth
>> University Richmond Virginia USA and Rutgers University New Jersey
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
>> 1) (z)k = z(z + 1)(z + 2)...(z + k - 1), k positive integer
Notation is wrong (z)k is meaningless, should be f(k,z)
These guys must be very new to math.
local host - 27 Feb 2008 23:32 GMT
>>> Moa Adagodu and Doron Zeilberger of respectively Virginia Commonwealth
>>> University Richmond Virginia USA and Rutgers University New Jersey
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> These guys must be very new to math.
yes, arXiv unfortunately is full of bullshit papers by quacks and wantabees,
it is too hard to filter out what is viable and what is just "made up
stuff", like "Probable Causation/Influence (PI)" another sporadic invisible
vapor from the purple planet petunia.
OsherD - 29 Feb 2008 06:18 GMT
> too many mistake here
> That cannot apply, deleted.- Hide quoted text -
From Osher Doctorow:
Readers should keep track of people who suddenly appear on a person's
threads without having been there for years. I've been posting
threads to sci.physics for years, and nobody named "Al Lergy" has ever
contributed to my knowledge, unless he sneaked in while I was out of
town.
His comments, of course, are not only meaningless but unexplained and
out of context one-worders or one-liners, the usual mark of the Troll
or Graffiti Artist. The usual Trolls like Doug who did a similar
Graffiti type comment earlier have to be understood as having the
function of Trolls attempting to increase their credibility by the
force of constituting a Crowd agreeing with each other, a typical
MoveOn.Org type tactic in politics by the way.
Osher Doctorow