Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / March 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ancient Greek Inference

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Douglas Eagleson - 30 Mar 2008 03:51 GMT
Forms were the relative relations.  All transcedental relations were
sought for examination.  After all, a single inter-relation of forms
was determined. A form amongst all to relate.

I try as a student to exactly instruct.  An imagination was the
realization of the moment.  A memory was a need for prior knowledge to
appear in the mind.  Ancient scholars instructed as exact users of
thoughts.  A memory would appear.

The form was a hard relation to grasp.  As a composition it was
difficult to infer, but I have recreated ancient structural thought.
A world as relation was all examinable and found endlessly rich with
content, transcendental relations.  A scientist can learn ancient
method by reading this advice.

Structure a simple thought and memory event as a combined mind. Let a
memory act as a part of your inference.  Almost double thought was
this form, but under intense examination, a memory was found half the
inference.  Old Greek method is hard, but with sly thought a person
may master.

So abstract the topic to begin.  Let's select "thumbdrives"  Abstract
these little memory devices.  Sit and continue repeating this
abstraction.

Almost meditate and abstract.

Now wait for the first memory to occur. "A single" will appear in
memory.  A true and real thought of memory only will accompany
abstracted thumbdrives.

A relative number was found relatable to the abstracted element.
Please slowly begin the examination of all element to number.

Anybody can now act as a real student of Aristotle.  Combined thought
to memory.  Each thought would be controled and only definitive
nonwandering mind events would occur.  Clear inference was as simple
as this example.
Robert J. Kolker - 30 Mar 2008 14:22 GMT
> Anybody can now act as a real student of Aristotle.  Combined thought
> to memory.  Each thought would be controled and only definitive
> nonwandering mind events would occur.  Clear inference was as simple
> as this example.

Is that why Aristotle f.cked up motion so badly?  His physics was not
even wrong.

Bob Kolker
Douglas Eagleson - 30 Mar 2008 14:28 GMT
> > Anybody can now act as a real student of Aristotle.  Combined thought
> > to memory.  Each thought would be controled and only definitive
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Bob Kolker

It is mistaken to read his works.  Learn the inference first.
tadchem - 31 Mar 2008 00:26 GMT
> > Anybody can now act as a real student of Aristotle.  Combined thought
> > to memory.  Each thought would be controled and only definitive
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Bob Kolker

Eagleson cannot even master English grammar.  He is probably also
incapable of the clarity of thought to recognize that Aristotle's
physics and astronomy were dead wrong.  At least the Pythagoreans had
a handle on some math.

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
Douglas Eagleson - 31 Mar 2008 13:05 GMT
> > > Anybody can now act as a real student of Aristotle.  Combined thought
> > > to memory.  Each thought would be controled and only definitive
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Tom Davidson
> Richmond, VA

I explained the basic inference.  And you spout crap at the topic like
a jackass.   You have ZERO sensible reaction to the content.

The worst thing top deal with is baby grammer scientists.
tadchem - 31 Mar 2008 22:12 GMT
On Mar 31, 8:05 am, Douglas Eagleson <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> > > > Anybody can now act as a real student of Aristotle.  Combined thought
> > > > to memory.  Each thought would be controled and only definitive
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> I explained the basic inference.

That doesn't make it correct, that doesn't make it empirically
verified, and it doesn't even make it smart.

Inference is only a small part of the scientific method, and valuable
only AFTER the empirical data is available for interpretation.

> And you spout crap at the topic like
> a jackass.

Jackasses like me can only spout crap out of one end, but in this case
it is the appropriate response.  It's like a dog pissing on a hydrant
to cover the stench of another dog's piss with his own.  That makes me
the winner, for now.

> You have ZERO sensible reaction to the content.

Perhaps that is because the content has zero sense.

> The worst thing top deal with is baby grammer scientists.

You can't spell, either. You've given me a 'two-fer.'  I will have to
guess that what you meant to say is "The worst thing TO deal with is
baby GRAMMAR scientists."

BTW, your name anagrams to "Do Lose Languages," among other things:
http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=douglas+eagleson&t=1000

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.