 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / March 2008Accelerating Matter Decelerates Time
Acceleration slows time by creating motion. For every velocity up to light there is a slower time rate given by the Gamma Factor. Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 > Acceleration slows time by creating motion. For every velocity up to > light there is a slower time rate given by the Gamma Factor. > > Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 Time as is viewed by this popular concept is relative. What we experience, if we travel with the velocity, is a slow down but has time truly slowed or only the perception? Time is constant only our perceptions are changed? Reality is perception? On Mar 29, 11:31 pm, mitchg...@hotmail.com wrote: > Acceleration slows time by creating motion. For every velocity up to > light there is a slower time rate given by the Gamma Factor. > > Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 Mitch, I generally ignore your silly posts, but this time you have outdone even yourself. Motion in essence is defined as dS/dt, the change in position with respect to time, also termed velocity. It is what a physicist or mathematician would describe and the first derivative of position as a function of time. Accleration is mere the second derivitive or d2S/ dt2, or dV/dt. ' Acceleration does not create motion except in the case where a body at rest begins to move. Acceleration simply modifies the rate or direction of motion. Acceleration is a function of time. Time is not a function of acceleration. Mitch, you my want to spend a few hours learning the difference between dependent variables and independent variables. Harry C. On Mar 29, 8:30 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mar 29, 11:31 pm, mitchg...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Harry C. Without acceleration first there is no motion. Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 On Mar 30, 5:16 pm, mitchg...@hotmail.com wrote: > On Mar 29, 8:30 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Wrong again Mitch. Read Newton. Harry C. On Mar 30, 3:00 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mar 30, 5:16 pm, mitchg...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Matter needs to be accelerated to be set into motion. Acceleration comes first. Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 On Mar 30, 6:30 am, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mar 29, 11:31 pm, mitchg...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Motion in essence is defined as dS/dt, the change in position with > respect to time, also termed velocity. It is what a physicist or only if S is a 3d vector > mathematician would describe and the first derivative of position as a > function of time. Accleration is mere the second derivitive or d2S/ > dt2, or dV/dt. only if accl is constant > ' > Acceleration does not create motion except in the case where a body at [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Harry C. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.