A letter from a professor
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Basti05b@aol.com - 29 Apr 2008 08:02 GMT Dear Newsgroup:
I have received an email by someone who is a professor at a well-known university, I cannot reveal his name.
This is his letter.
? Mehran: Your message is incoherent. Please seek psychiatric help. Continuing to post such messages will only get you further abuse. Is there anyone you trust near you who can take you to an emergency room for evaluation? Emergency rooms must treat you Even if you cannot pay.
Just tell them that Einstein was wrong and you have the key to the Universe, but no one believes you.?
A type of answer I gave him is this:
Well, This is a new trick. You and your colleagues have blocked the natural developments of my new math for decades, now you have been cornered and do not have any avenue to play your game, thus playing such a nonsense trick.
If you want to contradict my formula, you need to initiate studying it for many years to understand its dynamics.
It is a universe of its own.
That professor then answered back:
? I have absolutely no interest in tricking you.
You can continue to post messages, since no one can stop you.
I will try to reason with you once more, but then you are on your own.
You will not convince anyone of anything, nor will anyone read the large files and printouts you have posted.
Why? You are either mentally unbalanced, or you have managed to figure out how to make postings on newsgroups so that you appear to be mentally unbalanced.
I don't care which it is, but if you are sincerely trying to post what you think are important Messages, you need care.
There are perhaps simple treatments, like lithium, that really help some people.?
Until the math community is freed from the hands of a few, obviously we will have problems disseminating my science.
I assure you that; I will not accept the status of the math establishment, since I am totally independent.
It is better you and your colleagues stop the power struggle and start understanding this new science.
The cause of the problems is illegal control of a few over academia.
Dr.M.Basti
Basti05b@aol.com - 29 Apr 2008 08:08 GMT Dear Newsgroup:
Looks like that professor has been paranoid and shaking.
Even somehow threatening me!
They are no doubt in position of power, but I have to continue my position as usual without them (I hope).
As I told you before, I am in an intellectual war with my enemies; my new math is my weapon.
Dr.M.Basti
Basti05b@aol.com - 29 Apr 2008 08:12 GMT Dear Newsgroup:
If you look at one of my files you can see that I have compared my math with those of Newton and Descartes.
Well, this is what I feel about the new universe of computations for over 25 years.
You think that never someone like them might come again!
If you get to know this new world of math, you will agree with me that, I am right.
So, the key to questions is to start supporting my science.
I believe that, I am at the rank of the past masters (and I do not have any reasons to believe otherwise), and then it is natural to question someone like Einstein.
Well, it was a question naturally surfaced on back of my mind and I needed to communicate, realizing it is difficult to many comprehend the situation.
But unfortunately, sooner or later, we need to face hard scientific questions, whether we like it or not.
So, start communicating with my math, rather than other nonsense issues (I will never allow them to play games with me in the academia).
Dr.M.Basti
none - 29 Apr 2008 08:31 GMT > Dear Newsgroup: > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Dr.M.Basti So you feel you have done something great and no one appreciates it. But you have done nothing new, just claiming to have redone something done centuries ago. That is not interesting and no one will care.
When you start deciding that you know more than Einstein even though you have not studied physics, you can expect people to point out your mistakes and laugh at you.
So you feel you are a master. Show something, anything at all, that would be worthy of one. So far you have shown us nothing.
none - 29 Apr 2008 08:12 GMT > Dear Newsgroup: > [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] > > Dr.M.Basti It is sad but the professor is correct. You are posting hopes with no backing for them. You do not know physics but you want to change it. That will not work. You have posted nothing new but you hope somehow that people will assume you have something to say. You have not shown how you think your equations are any better than those that have worked for a century. Predict something new and then you can ask people to listen. There is no reason to change what works fine. Change comes from new situations.
Sanny - 29 Apr 2008 08:33 GMT What is the new Formula
I saw in that PDF
E= mc^2 +m'(c)
A bit Confusing Can you send the Derivative Formula.
Has you defined something new that Differentaion & Integration?
Are you inclined towards the Mathematical side or the Physics Side.
That is are your Observation based on Experiments or you have just generated a few theorems?
Please send the link and let me verify it. May be you are Correct But chances are very rare as todays Science has got more complex and chances of getting Errors in your equations is very high.
Bye Sanny
Extreme Discussion at: http://www.getclub.com/Discussion.php
Basti05b@aol.com - 29 Apr 2008 09:19 GMT Dear Newsgroup:
I have multiple postings on some newsgroups, such as sci.math, sci.math.symbolic, sci. physics, and sci.physics relativity.
You need to see at least some of them.
Unfortunately, I cannot respond to postings to unknown names like short or first names.
Dr.M.Basti
Basti05b@aol.com - 29 Apr 2008 09:54 GMT Dear Newsgroup:
Since the last two decades, I have already learned what are the tricks and physiological games my enemies will play, in order to keep their positions intact.
But I have made it clear that; I will not be part of them.
Sooner or later, they will realize this real fact.
Unlike them, I am not a conventional mathematician nor I am part of their establishment in anyway. Simply, I do not recognize their value judgments (in math societies).
I am a true scholar, and always have been.
By the way, I have a key mathematical formula of the universe (YES), and from mathematics, we can learn a lot about the physical world, despite the fact that I am not a physicist.
So, put your psychological games in your backyard, it will not affect me in anyway what so ever.
Dr.M.Basti
Sanny - 29 Apr 2008 11:33 GMT On Apr 29, 1:54 pm, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
> Dear Newsgroup: > > Since the last two decades, I have already learned what are the tricks > and physiological games my enemies will play, in order to keep their > positions intact. Oh god I am playing Tricks What Trick do you found in the Question I asked?
> But I have made it clear that; I will not be part of them. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > their establishment in anyway. Simply, I do not recognize their value > judgments (in math societies). If you are not a Mathematician how you derived the formula? Have you invented some new Maths?
Please tell us and if needed that will also be taught in Schools & Colleges
> I am a true scholar, and always have been. > > By the way, I have a key mathematical formula of the universe (YES), > and from mathematics, we can learn a lot about the physical world, > despite the fact that I am not a physicist. I Suppose String Theory already does that.
Till you not give the link of what you have done no one will understand what you are saying.
> So, put your psychological games in your backyard, it will not affect > me in anyway what so ever. Well Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html and let me see how many games you win?
> Dr.M.Basti Here I repeat my Origninal Question. If you want people accept your Theorems you need to Explain all details else no one can understand what you are saying.
<<<<<<<------------------ ORIGINAL POST What is the new Formula
I saw in that PDF
E= mc^2 +m'(c)
A bit Confusing Can you send the Derivative Formula.
Has you defined something new that Differentaion & Integration?
Are you inclined towards the Mathematical side or the Physics Side.
That is are your Observation based on Experiments or you have just generated a few theorems?
Please send the link and let me verify it. May be you are Correct But chances are very rare as todays Science has got more complex and chances of getting Errors in your equations is very high.
Bye Sanny
Original Post----------------->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I have never communicated you before and I saw your First post Today. So am neither your Friend nor Enemy.
Bye Sanny
Extreme Discussion at: http://www.getclub.com/Discussion.php
Androcles - 29 Apr 2008 15:57 GMT LIAR.
 Signature This message is brought to you by Androcles http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
Sanny - 29 Apr 2008 17:21 GMT > LIAR. > > -- > This message is brought to you by Androcles > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ Who is Liar and why???
Bye Sanny
Androcles - 29 Apr 2008 18:44 GMT  Signature This message is brought to you by Androcles http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
On Apr 29, 7:57 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote:
> LIAR. > > -- > This message is brought to you by Androcles > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
| Who is Liar and why??? You are a liar. Your questions have been answered even if you don't like the answers you were given.
none - 29 Apr 2008 17:05 GMT > Dear Newsgroup: > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Dr.M.Basti You are going from a curiousity to a true crank. You show nothing yet expect praise. Learn some physics and then try to apply your great new formula. Then come and be willing to discuss.
none - 29 Apr 2008 17:04 GMT > Dear Newsgroup: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Dr.M.Basti If you are afraid to discuss your work, then we know how uncertain you are of it.
Uncle Al - 29 Apr 2008 21:38 GMT > Dear Newsgroup: > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Mehran: > Your message is incoherent. Please seek psychiatric help. [snip]
Go for it.
 Signature Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Basti05b@aol.com - 30 Apr 2008 01:35 GMT Dear Newsgroup:
I looked at the internet for Lithium: “ Lithium affects the flow of sodium through nerve and muscle cells in the body. Sodium affects excitation or mania.
Lithium is used to treat the manic episodes of manic depression. Manic symptoms include hyperactivity, rushed speech, poor judgment, reduced need for sleep, aggression, and anger. Lithium also helps to prevent or lessen the intensity of manic episodes.
Lithium may also be used for purposes other than those listed in this medication guide.”
I am perfectly fine.
I believe many of our leaders in the math community, including the professor who wrote the letter, should take Lithium.
They are the ones created a mess in the math community and should think about their poor judgment in academia, as well as ignoring the new developments of mathematics.
If they do not learn about the history, certainly history will repeat itself and teach them hard lessons.
Dr.M.Basti
Eric Gisse - 30 Apr 2008 01:59 GMT On Apr 29, 4:35 pm, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
> Dear Newsgroup: > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > I am perfectly fine. Do your friends and family agree?
> I believe many of our leaders in the math community, including the > professor who wrote the letter, should take Lithium. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Dr.M.Basti none - 30 Apr 2008 02:08 GMT > Dear Newsgroup: > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > Dr.M.Basti So you have done nothing of note in your research but you think we should all honor you. That is not how it works. Show something worthy of respect. Crying and self pity are the wrong subjects for a science newsgroup.
Basti05b@aol.com - 30 Apr 2008 02:25 GMT Dear Newsgroup:
Well, obviously I have lost my entire career, with a long term of unemployment and adjunct positions.
This is a direct result of the strange behavior of the math community.
But I have certain principles that are not negotiable, and I happen to fully enjoy my new math (otherwise I would not be able to find a key for the universe as simple and as beautiful as Riccati, or continue the research for the quarter of the century).
I have to tolerate the current atmosphere of my intellectual war with my enemies in the math community.
I am happy, accomplished my creativity dreams at the rank of the past masters, and fully understand the prices I had to pay.
My mathematics will be for centuries to come, I am also writing here for the future historical reference.
I have decided to be independent in my academic endevor as much as I could, and not engage in academic games as I had experienced exists in the academia.
Dr.M.Basti
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 30 Apr 2008 04:25 GMT > Dear Newsgroup:
> I looked at the internet for Lithium: > ? > Lithium affects the flow of sodium through nerve and muscle cells in > the body. Sodium affects excitation or mania.
> Lithium is used to treat the manic episodes of manic depression. Manic > symptoms include hyperactivity, rushed speech, poor judgment, reduced > need for sleep, aggression, and anger. Lithium also helps to prevent > or lessen the intensity of manic episodes.
> Lithium may also be used for purposes other than those listed in this > medication guide.?
> I am perfectly fine. Nope; raving lunatic.
 Signature Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
Basti05b@aol.com - 30 Apr 2008 04:02 GMT Basti...@aol.com wrote:
> This is his letter.
> I will try to reason with you once more, but then you are on your own. What does that mean? Is he threatening me?
I have been always on my own. Or he is saying he will block all my avenues in every direction? He and his gangs have already done it.
> You will not convince anyone of anything, nor will anyone read the > large files and printouts you have posted. Obviously they have managed to illegally get control of the academia. So, it is not the way they say publicly, it is its reverse.
This means the natural functions of science has been corrupted in such a way that the academia cannot dare to raise any scientific questions as they intend to do (as well as pursue the unconventional fields), since the professor and his gangs will not allow them.
This is an anti-science atmosphere in the math community.
Dr.M.Basti
Basti05b@aol.com - 30 Apr 2008 04:39 GMT Basti...@aol.com wrote:
> This is his letter.
>, but if you are sincerely trying to post what > you think are important Messages, ...... I have no doubt that the leaders in the math community have only one thing in mind, that is their leadership.
But fields are depreciated for decades and new filled like mine are emerging.
They are certainly afraid that they lose the control of leadership to others (possibly they do not see themselves competent in emerging fields).
Once I had mentioned and demonstrated many times that a group of polynomials are based, as a class in a Riccati, he and his gangs cannot stop it.
I have explained what I have and they have completely blocked it.
Let me clear once more one fact. I do not recognize current leaders in the math community (i.e. their status).
Thus do not play game with me and I will find means of opening this dynamic mathematics to the public without their cooperation (2000 pages and a software after copyright).
Dr.M.Basti
|
|
|