Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / April 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

A Real Theory and a Correct Theory

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Douglas Eagleson - 29 Apr 2008 20:55 GMT
A test as a cause to correct theory will be discussed.  How can effect
appear from noplace?  And the answer was as all effect displays a
defect then all place can cause defect.

I do not use whirring gears, electromagnetic field or anything but the
cause as effect itself.  A system can be manufactured such that
inversion causes a time to exist.  A relativistic force appear the
cause as space itself.  I speak not of vacuum energy, I speak as a
person discovering the cause.  A place as location in relativistic
frames of reference causes.  A material as a gaseous location will
display locations effect equally.  A vacuum is not effecting.

Notice a frame was all that necessitates a violation.  A place effect
in all frames such that all force equates locally.  Conservation of
energy appears the equation of two frames. As a person violates a
place a force appears.  Making violation theory.

Now apply a system.

Train track - >>>
Train =  O

                             O- motion to right

Either the train may be held moving or the track in relation to a
train moves.  A track motion relative to the third frame then appears
to solve equations of energy.  An erg spent to move the train is
relative to the third frame, and without energy expended on track
motion, it can be held not accelerating at all.

So relative frame appears energy expended dependent.

Pretend special relativity occurs.  Answer the size of energy
expended.  A motion as frame will then make a defect in a priori of
frame energy expenditure. A train’s mass increases with speed relative
to the track.  So at speed a larger erg must be used to accelerate. On
the train a smaller erg shall be measure per speed change.

Two values of energy per unit speed change are observed.

A prior of relativity allows equation of these energies.

Causes a frame in abstract relative to both. We shall use a flying
bird’s frame.  A bird as a free gliding motion may be at rest energy
expenditure wise. So may the track.  Unless mass energy conversion
occurs a special class of frame exists. A priori of the trains energy
conversion allows a special case solution to special relativity.

Energy at the train may be calculated as a method where only the
appearance of frame bird was necessary. A bird moves.

So the bird is in motion and so is the earth and the train.  But the
earth frame has no a priori of matter conversion!  So the earth energy
conversion is zero relative to the bird. Making the mass always stay
the same on the earth, while the train always decreases, i.e. energy
is expended on the train.

A decrease of mass a priori allows a special acceleration equation.

Etrain causes mass differential train, only.

So energy equation shall be as follow:

Etrain = mdelta*c^2/beta

Beta = square root(1-v^2/c^2)

mdelta may then be a priori calculated.  A bird shall estimate a mass
utilized and so shall the track occupant.

A frame energy is therefore speed dependent.  So all is well in
special relativity as equation.  A time as energy change appear the
frame solution now.  As time decreases a prior on the train what
happens to energy?

A priori the train observes a same constant of mass to energy
conversion. E=m*c^2 appears frame independent.

Making the a priori of energy a two valued system. One speed
dependent, the other frame independent.

So rest mass appears the frame independent factor.  As mass is
distinct from energy all mass must obey a relative frame dependency or
independency. It can not exist as both.  So measure as a time effect
equates mass to energy, but measure of mass itself is a frame
independent factor!

So functional relation as dependent while factor was independent
implies a time effect only on energy measure.

Time does not effect rest mass.  So all is well in special relativity.

What happens to a priori?  A bird can infer also like a train track
occupant the new energy function correctly measured on the train.
Base all energy NOW as a priori.  Alter special relativity so that the
bird measures a correct relative energy function!!!

Pretend this modified a prior theory exists.

A train occupant now must correct the energy defect theory.  He know
his function was correct in the birds frame only. So he expects an
energy defect.

Here in the end transformation I had stated a small theory of frame
effect. We see defect.  A train in motion as a body expects to never
measure the function correctly. A preferred frame a priori is the
theory.

Just say this is real as a small theory. NOW add up the bird frame
relative to the tracks.

Etrack = Ebird/beta

So the function of a priori as energy appears.  All frames as abstract
bird system are so related in reality.
Douglas Eagleson - 29 Apr 2008 21:06 GMT
On Apr 29, 12:55 pm, Douglas Eagleson <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> A test as a cause to correct theory will be discussed.  How can effect
> appear from noplace?  And the answer was as all effect displays a
[quoted text clipped - 111 lines]
> So the function of a priori as energy appears.  All frames as abstract
> bird system are so related in reality.

When a priori is held as theory a last function displays amazing
reality.  Energy as an entity obeys a special relativity function.

Nomally;

energy = m*c^2/beta

now we can a priori measure all effect in relativity.
RichD - 29 Apr 2008 23:59 GMT
> > A test as a cause to correct theory will be discussed.  How can effect
> > appear from noplace?  And the answer was as all effect displays a
[quoted text clipped - 120 lines]
>
> now we can a priori measure all effect in relativity.

This sh.t is gold.

Dude, have you ever thought to hire yourself
out as a random number generator?

--
Rich
Douglas Eagleson - 30 Apr 2008 00:36 GMT
> > > A test as a cause to correct theory will be discussed.  How can effect
> > > appear from noplace?  And the answer was as all effect displays a
[quoted text clipped - 130 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

It is exactly written so to miss the first relation considered means
all will be not following anything.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.