If I only had a brain
|
|
Thread rating:  |
kdthrge@yahoo.com - 06 Jun 2008 02:46 GMT I could be a greenie wienie, Repeat what I'm believing, If I only had brain
Melting ice. I'd go to see it, All my fault, I would believe it, If I only had a brain.... ,,,,
As an ardent, greenie wienie, I'd turn off, my air conditioning, In the heat I'd not complain,
In the dark, no fuel for heating, Climate change, I'd be believing, If I only had a brain,,,, ,,,,,,,,,
If there's facts, I would ignore them, Denialists I would abhore them, Believing in climate change
With no science in my pocket, Launched to space by Boxer's rocket, If I only had a brain ,,,,,,,,,,,
Greenie wienies all would love me, With algore up there above me, I'd believe in climate change
Although I have never seen it, Global warming really means it, If I only had a brain,,,
Watcher of MarxoFascists and EnviroFascists - 06 Jun 2008 03:36 GMT On Jun 5, 9:46 pm, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:
> I could be a greenie wienie, > Repeat what I'm believing, [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > Global warming really means it, > If I only had a brain,,, BRAVO!!!!
Go make a youtube video!
PS sci.environment is another ng that should get this.
scottsoperson - 06 Jun 2008 04:00 GMT repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences.
On Jun 5, 9:36 pm, Watcher of MarxoFascists and EnviroFascists <greenmoney2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 9:46 pm, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > PS sci.environment is another ng that should get this. Ouroboros_Rex - 06 Jun 2008 20:23 GMT > repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences. repubs can't read the national academy of sciences.
kdthrge@yahoo.com - 07 Jun 2008 17:07 GMT > > repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences. > > repubs can't read the national academy of sciences. The National Academy of Sciences is soon to lose their accreditation, and if the insane economic controls are passed by the politicians, will also be criminally liable.
But you can ignore these facts and hate the denialists as a good little AGW bunnie does.
Science means the determination of facts. The determination of the facts of the property of greenhouse gases and climate change can meet no burden of proof.
The theoretical scientists, (et al Dancin Hansen) have imposed upon the US EPA standards for greenhouse gases which are used in calibrating allowances and offset ratings between CO2, methane, and N20. These are entirely based upon theoretical interpretations of spectral readings.
There is no laboratory basis that these gases inordinately retain energy which would mean an effect upon temperature. There is no laboratory evidence to support these ratings between the gases.
The fact is that careful scientific investigation can very clearly prove that these theoretical estimations are invalid. Yet the NAS does not support such studies, and has given their sanction to theoretical postulates which are not supported by SCIENCE and can be directly disproved by SCIENCE.
Scaremongering is used to get public funding about climate change. Yet this money is not used objectively to analyze, but to reach the end conclusion falsely. This domain of theoretical science has no interest in science which would disprove their doomsday beliefs, and reduce the 'emergency' of more funding for indirect studies.
It can be directly proved that the NAS is not capable of doing valid science in the field of theoretical climatology or basic chemistry and analysis of gases.
Therefore they are a useless appendage. The public economy produces revenue which these individuals accept.
Their intrinsic failure at both direct science and theoretical science and their complicity in the crimes of imposing controls and laws without the burden of proof required by fair law, will be contstrued as criminal according to how many peoples lives these falsehoods affect, particulary how many working class and middle class lives are destroyed by the wealthy elite greenie wienies and their compulsion to strangle us from our essential needs for energy.
KD
Kurt Lochner - 08 Jun 2008 05:23 GMT > > > repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences. > > > > repubs can't read the national academy of sciences. > >The National Academy of Sciences is soon to lose their accreditation, In your dreams..
--See subject header for details..
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 09 Jun 2008 18:17 GMT Reality is in a 1,000 years from now and they give brain transplants your brain will cost the most. After all its just like new never been used. It will be given a life time guarantee. Bert
Sri Bodhi Prana - 20 Jul 2008 22:41 GMT On Jun 7, 10:07 am, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences. > > > repubs can't read the national academy of sciences. > > The National Academy of Sciences is soon to lose their accreditation, You don't have the faintest idea what you are talking about.
> There is no laboratory basis that these gases inordinately retain > energy which would mean an effect upon temperature. There is no > laboratory evidence to support these ratings between the gases. Yes, there is. Just because you are not aware of experiments does not mean they do not exist.
Sri Bodhi Prana
Rich - 20 Jul 2008 22:44 GMT > On Jun 7, 10:07 am, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Yes, there is. Just because you are not aware of experiments does not > mean they do not exist. I assume this implies that you are aware of said experiments.
Can you tell me who has done them and where the results are?
> Sri Bodhi Prana Cheers,
Rich
Day Brown - 23 Jul 2008 20:31 GMT >> Yes, there is. Just because you are not aware of experiments does not >> mean they do not exist. > > I assume this implies that you are aware of said experiments. > > Can you tell me who has done them and where the results are? Lets start with the Greenland Ice core data. There's lotsa links, you can pick your own, since you would not trust anything I provide.
But they all say the same thing; ice ages come and go, quite often within a few score years, one example in a mere decade. But the other thing we see is that Global Warming began with the end of the last ice age, 12,000 years ago. This in contrast to all previous eras of warmth which never lasted more than a few hundred years.
There are also innumerable links to the shrinkage of glaciers. If you do not know of them, I cannot communicate anything useful to you. You may live on a different Matrix for all I know.
As to why the warming is going on, that certainly has been affected by politics, and I dont pretend to know. But I was born on a farm, have lived in the Ozarks for most of the last 40 years, and since I am involved in the commercial production of a wide variety of herbs, I pay attention to the weather patterns, and I see the weather changing.
There are wildlife species from Texas and LA moving in. Roadrunners, prickly pear, yucca, and armadillo would not be here without warming. I dont mind, but this complicates the calculations of agribusiness since they dont feel they can rely on the weather data. That uncertainty has contributed to the rise in YOUR food prices Rich.
I lived for 5 years on the Gulf Coast, became familiar with the moonsoon rain patterns, and now see that whereas they formerly petered out about 100 miles north of the cost, they are more like 200, and will soon be affecting Ozark weather. I'm not complaining, the cloud cover brought cooler temps and more rain. But if you harvest grain not herbs, trying to get the crop dry enuf for storage costs *money*.
I'd like more studies; I am not at all sure that what they have in mind will be at all effective. But to pretend its not going on is neurotic. Such neurosis is also evident in the lame humor.
Steve Thomas - 07 Jun 2008 20:25 GMT > > repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences. > > repubs can't read the national academy of sciences. k00k-a-d00dle-d0000!
kdthrge@yahoo.com - 15 Jun 2008 18:28 GMT > repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences. It is inspiring to see the faith that the Greenie Wienies have in their mentors; Tyndell, Dancin Hansen, NAS, Algore, Barbara Boxer, ..... To see them fearlessly bet their lives and every body else's lives upon the credibility and the validity of the conclusions of these mentors who themselves cannot directly support their own beliefs and rely upon the deception of their own propaganda to gain these beliefs.
The Greenie Wienies at some point will have to wake up and face reality. Part of this reality will be criminal prosecution for lies and fraud. Just as algore is protected now by the freedom of religion, at some point his involvement with public affairs will be clearly provable to be criminal and he will have to face the music, despite the fact that he has always been a wealthy rich boy who has never been faced with the reality of his lies.
KD
robw - 15 Jun 2008 23:57 GMT "algore"
All we need to know about the source of your "original" ideas.
On Jun 5, 10:00 pm, scottsoperson <scottsoper...@aol.com> wrote:
> repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences. It is inspiring to see the faith that the Greenie Wienies have in their mentors; Tyndell, Dancin Hansen, NAS, Algore, Barbara Boxer, ..... To see them fearlessly bet their lives and every body else's lives upon the credibility and the validity of the conclusions of these mentors who themselves cannot directly support their own beliefs and rely upon the deception of their own propaganda to gain these beliefs.
The Greenie Wienies at some point will have to wake up and face reality. Part of this reality will be criminal prosecution for lies and fraud. Just as algore is protected now by the freedom of religion, at some point his involvement with public affairs will be clearly provable to be criminal and he will have to face the music, despite the fact that he has always been a wealthy rich boy who has never been faced with the reality of his lies.
KD
Claudius Denk - 07 Jun 2008 17:31 GMT Kurt Lochner - 08 Jun 2008 05:23 GMT .
>If I only had brain How true..
--Keep telling on yourself..
kdthrge@yahoo.com - 20 Jul 2008 21:32 GMT On Jun 5, 8:46 pm, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:
> I could be a greenie wienie, > Repeat what I'm believing, [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > Global warming really means it, > If I only had a brain,,, How about a reprise. Not for profit reproduction fully allowed.
Greenie wienies unite. It is your duty to rule the rest of us with your bullshit science. Don't worry, though. That paper boat of false science and lies in which you are riding will never spring a leak or fall apart when you are in the middle of the ocean.
Just look at your 'god' of your religion, Algore. He lies with every sentence and gets away with it. People believe him and he has recieved awards. Have some faith that the complacency of people will remain when you cut their power and air conditioning and ruin their economies.
Good luck in hell,
KD
Kurt Lochner - 26 Jul 2008 00:02 GMT > >If I only had brain --Indeed, but you don't..
|
|
|