Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

If I only had a brain

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kdthrge@yahoo.com - 06 Jun 2008 02:46 GMT
I could be a greenie wienie,
Repeat what I'm believing,
If I only had brain

Melting ice. I'd go to see it,
All my fault, I would believe it,
If I only had a brain....
,,,,

As an ardent, greenie wienie,
I'd turn off, my air conditioning,
In the heat I'd not complain,

In the dark, no fuel for heating,
Climate change, I'd be believing,
If I only had a brain,,,,
,,,,,,,,,

If there's facts, I would ignore them,
Denialists I would abhore them,
Believing in climate change

With no science in my pocket,
Launched to space by Boxer's rocket,
If I only had a brain
,,,,,,,,,,,

Greenie wienies all would love me,
With algore up there above me,
I'd believe in climate change

Although I have never seen it,
Global warming really means it,
If I only had a brain,,,
Watcher of MarxoFascists and EnviroFascists - 06 Jun 2008 03:36 GMT
On Jun 5, 9:46 pm, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:
> I could be a greenie wienie,
> Repeat what I'm believing,
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> Global warming really means it,
> If I only had a brain,,,

BRAVO!!!!

Go make a youtube video!

PS sci.environment is another ng that should get this.
scottsoperson - 06 Jun 2008 04:00 GMT
repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences.

On Jun 5, 9:36 pm, Watcher of MarxoFascists and EnviroFascists
<greenmoney2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 9:46 pm, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> PS sci.environment is another ng that should get this.
Ouroboros_Rex - 06 Jun 2008 20:23 GMT
> repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences.

repubs can't read the national academy of sciences.
kdthrge@yahoo.com - 07 Jun 2008 17:07 GMT
> > repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences.
>
> repubs can't read the national academy of sciences.

The National Academy of Sciences is soon to lose their accreditation,
and if the insane economic controls are passed by the politicians,
will also be criminally liable.

But you can ignore these facts and hate the denialists as a good
little AGW bunnie does.

Science means the determination of facts.
The determination of the facts of the property of greenhouse gases and
climate change can meet no burden of proof.

The theoretical scientists, (et al Dancin Hansen) have imposed upon
the US EPA standards for greenhouse gases which are used in
calibrating allowances and offset ratings between CO2, methane, and
N20. These are entirely based upon theoretical interpretations of
spectral readings.

There is no laboratory basis that these gases inordinately retain
energy which would mean an effect upon temperature. There is no
laboratory evidence to support these ratings between the gases.

The fact is that careful scientific investigation can very clearly
prove that these theoretical estimations are invalid. Yet the NAS does
not support such studies, and has given their sanction to theoretical
postulates which are not supported by SCIENCE and can be directly
disproved by SCIENCE.

Scaremongering is used to get public funding about climate change. Yet
this money is not used objectively to analyze, but to reach the end
conclusion falsely. This domain of theoretical science has no interest
in science which would disprove their doomsday beliefs, and reduce the
'emergency' of more funding for indirect studies.

It can be directly proved that the NAS is not capable of doing valid
science in the field of theoretical climatology or basic chemistry and
analysis of gases.

Therefore they are a useless appendage. The public economy produces
revenue which these individuals accept.

Their intrinsic failure at both direct science and theoretical science
and their complicity in the crimes of imposing controls and laws
without the burden of proof required by fair law, will be contstrued
as criminal according to how many peoples lives these falsehoods
affect, particulary how many working class and middle class lives are
destroyed by the wealthy elite greenie wienies and their compulsion to
strangle us from our essential needs for energy.

KD
Kurt Lochner - 08 Jun 2008 05:23 GMT
> > > repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences.
> >
> > repubs can't read the national academy of sciences.
>
>The National Academy of Sciences is soon to lose their accreditation,

In your dreams..

--See subject header for details..
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 09 Jun 2008 18:17 GMT
Reality is in a 1,000 years from now and they give brain transplants
your brain will cost the most. After all its just like new  never been
used. It will be given a life time guarantee.  Bert
Sri Bodhi Prana - 20 Jul 2008 22:41 GMT
On Jun 7, 10:07 am, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:

> > > repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences.
>
> > repubs can't read the national academy of sciences.
>
> The National Academy of Sciences is soon to lose their accreditation,

You don't have the faintest idea what you are talking about.

> There is no laboratory basis that these gases inordinately retain
> energy which would mean an effect upon temperature. There is no
> laboratory evidence to support these ratings between the gases.

Yes, there is. Just because you are not aware of experiments does not
mean they do not exist.

Sri Bodhi Prana
Rich - 20 Jul 2008 22:44 GMT
> On Jun 7, 10:07 am, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Yes, there is. Just because you are not aware of experiments does not
> mean they do not exist.

I assume this implies that you are aware of said experiments.

Can you tell me who has done them and where the results are?

> Sri Bodhi Prana

Cheers,

Rich
Day Brown - 23 Jul 2008 20:31 GMT
>> Yes, there is. Just because you are not aware of experiments does not
>> mean they do not exist.
>
> I assume this implies that you are aware of said experiments.
>
> Can you tell me who has done them and where the results are?
Lets start with the Greenland Ice core data. There's lotsa links, you
can pick your own, since you would not trust anything I provide.

But they all say the same thing; ice ages come and go, quite often
within a few score years, one example in a mere decade. But the other
thing we see is that Global Warming began with the end of the last ice
age, 12,000 years ago. This in contrast to all previous eras of warmth
which never lasted more than a few hundred years.

There are also innumerable links to the shrinkage of glaciers. If you do
not know of them, I cannot communicate anything useful to you. You may
live on a different Matrix for all I know.

As to why the warming is going on, that certainly has been affected by
politics, and I dont pretend to know. But I was born on a farm, have
lived in the Ozarks for most of the last 40 years, and since I am
involved in the commercial production of a wide variety of herbs, I pay
attention to the weather patterns, and I see the weather changing.

There are wildlife species from Texas and LA moving in. Roadrunners,
prickly pear, yucca, and armadillo would not be here without warming. I
dont mind, but this complicates the calculations of agribusiness since
they dont feel they can rely on the weather data. That uncertainty has
contributed to the rise in YOUR food prices Rich.

I lived for 5 years on the Gulf Coast, became familiar with the moonsoon
rain patterns, and now see that whereas they formerly petered out about
100 miles north of the cost, they are more like 200, and will soon be
affecting Ozark weather. I'm not complaining, the cloud cover brought
cooler temps and more rain. But if you harvest grain not herbs, trying
to get the crop dry enuf for storage costs *money*.

I'd like more studies; I am not at all sure that what they have in mind
will be at all effective. But to pretend its not going on is neurotic.
Such neurosis is also evident in the lame humor.
Steve Thomas - 07 Jun 2008 20:25 GMT
> > repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences.
>
> repubs can't read the national academy of sciences.

k00k-a-d00dle-d0000!
kdthrge@yahoo.com - 15 Jun 2008 18:28 GMT
> repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences.

It is inspiring to see the faith that the Greenie Wienies have in
their mentors; Tyndell, Dancin Hansen, NAS, Algore, Barbara
Boxer, .....
To see them fearlessly bet their lives and every body else's lives
upon the credibility and the validity of the conclusions of these
mentors who themselves cannot directly support their own beliefs and
rely upon the deception of their own propaganda to gain these beliefs.

The Greenie Wienies at some point will have to wake up and face
reality. Part of this reality will be criminal prosecution for lies
and fraud. Just as algore is protected now by the freedom of religion,
at some point his involvement with public affairs will be clearly
provable to be criminal and he will have to face the music, despite
the fact that he has always been a wealthy rich boy who has never been
faced with the reality of his lies.

KD
robw - 15 Jun 2008 23:57 GMT
"algore"

All we need to know about the source of your "original" ideas.

On Jun 5, 10:00 pm, scottsoperson <scottsoper...@aol.com> wrote:
> repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences.

It is inspiring to see the faith that the Greenie Wienies have in
their mentors; Tyndell, Dancin Hansen, NAS, Algore, Barbara
Boxer, .....
To see them fearlessly bet their lives and every body else's lives
upon the credibility and the validity of the conclusions of these
mentors who themselves cannot directly support their own beliefs and
rely upon the deception of their own propaganda to gain these beliefs.

The Greenie Wienies at some point will have to wake up and face
reality. Part of this reality will be criminal prosecution for lies
and fraud. Just as algore is protected now by the freedom of religion,
at some point his involvement with public affairs will be clearly
provable to be criminal and he will have to face the music, despite
the fact that he has always been a wealthy rich boy who has never been
faced with the reality of his lies.

KD
Claudius Denk - 07 Jun 2008 17:31 GMT
Good stuff!

LOL
Kurt Lochner - 08 Jun 2008 05:23 GMT
.
>If I only had brain

How true..

--Keep telling on yourself..
kdthrge@yahoo.com - 20 Jul 2008 21:32 GMT
On Jun 5, 8:46 pm, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:
> I could be a greenie wienie,
> Repeat what I'm believing,
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> Global warming really means it,
> If I only had a brain,,,

How about a reprise.
Not for profit reproduction fully allowed.

Greenie wienies unite. It is your duty to rule the rest of us with
your bullshit science. Don't worry, though. That paper boat of false
science and lies in which you are riding will never spring a leak or
fall apart when you are in the middle of the ocean.

Just look at your 'god' of your religion, Algore.
He lies with every sentence and gets away with it. People believe him
and he has recieved awards.
Have some faith that the complacency of people will remain when you
cut their power and air conditioning and ruin their economies.

Good luck in hell,

KD
Kurt Lochner - 26 Jul 2008 00:02 GMT
> >If I only had brain

--Indeed, but you don't..
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.